> On Mar 3, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Semenyuk
> wrote:
>
> How about C++11? I have a pending patch for jpackage that depends on C++11
> features that I hesitate to pull in jdk15.
The reasons for HotSpot (at least) not already being on C++14 (cost of
switching over the Solaris Studio based plat
On 3/3/20 10:26 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> But one of the few things of which I am certain is that we must not
> allow the needs of backporting to determine the future of Java. That's
> the way of staying in the past.
Unpopular opinion: It's the enterprise customers that mainly pay for the
developm
How about C++11? I have a pending patch for jpackage that depends on
C++11 features that I hesitate to pull in jdk15.
- Alexey
On 3/3/2020 5:22 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
On 3/2/20 10:46 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
As lead of the 8 and 11 up
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2020-03-03 12:45, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
Hi.
Can you take a look on this change introducing make support for JCov
DiffCoverage command.
DiffCoverage allows to generate a textual report showing coverage for only
changed source code,
This is an example of how the
Hi.
Can you take a look on this change introducing make support for JCov
DiffCoverage command.
DiffCoverage allows to generate a textual report showing coverage for only
changed source code,
This is an example of how the functionality can be used:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 10:26 AM Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 3/2/20 10:46 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> > As lead of the 8 and 11 update projects you probably know best, if this fix
> > will eventually be considered for backporting and choose your means wisely
> > :)
>
> Yeah, I know. Srsly. :-)
>
>
On 3/2/20 10:46 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> As lead of the 8 and 11 update projects you probably know best, if this fix
> will eventually be considered for backporting and choose your means wisely
> :)
Yeah, I know. Srsly. :-)
But one of the few things of which I am certain is that we must not
a
On 3/2/20 9:51 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 7:00 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>
>> On 11/19/18 8:39 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
>>> I don't see any benefit to making the first C++ code change that uses
>>> a new feature also incorporate the needed build system changes.
>>> Indeed, how does
