On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 21:57:58 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote:
>> Thanks. Trivial, right? (So I can push now?)
>
> Yes, sure. Push it, if you haven’t already.
> Didn’t Martin give you a review as well?
>
> Sorry, I took a few off-screen (or screen off) hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Lutz
>
> From: Aleksey Shipil
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:04 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Sample build log sizes:
>
> PPC64 fastdebug, 200 kilobytes:
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-ppc64le-fastdebug.log
>
> S390X fastdebug, 20 megabytes!
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:48:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> This "noise generator" looks like a leftover from way back development
>> times. Thanks for tracking this down.
>
> Thanks. Trivial, right? (So I can push now?)
Yes, sure. Push it, if you haven’t already.
Didn’t Martin give you a revi
For historical reasons, there exists a variety of different implementations of
awk: awk (the original implementation), gawk (the GNU version), nawk (new awk,
iirc) and the lesser known mawk.
Things are complicated by the fact that the original awk is seldom used, but
instead gawk or nawk is ty
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:55:52 GMT, Lutz Schmidt wrote:
>> Sample build log sizes:
>>
>> PPC64 fastdebug, 200 kilobytes:
>>
>> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-ppc64le-fastdebug.log
>>
>> S390X fastdebug, 20 megabytes!
>>
>> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjd
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:25:35 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>>> That sounds very good indeed! I did not think it was possible for Skara to
>>> access the Checks area, but if it does, it's really where this belong.
>>
>> I've tried this out a bit in the playground now - perhaps something like
>
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 16:07:54 GMT, Robin Westberg wrote:
>> @rwestberg That sounds very good indeed! I did not think it was possible for
>> Skara to access the Checks area, but if it does, it's really where this
>> belong.
>
>> That sounds very good indeed! I did not think it was possible for Sk
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:54:48 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> That sounds very good indeed! I did not think it was possible for Skara to
> access the Checks area, but if it does, it's really where this belong.
I've tried this out a bit in the playground now - perhaps something like this:
https
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:04 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Sample build log sizes:
>
> PPC64 fastdebug, 200 kilobytes:
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-ppc64le-fastdebug.log
>
> S390X fastdebug, 20 megabytes!
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:18:04 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Sample build log sizes:
>
> PPC64 fastdebug, 200 kilobytes:
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-ppc64le-fastdebug.log
>
> S390X fastdebug, 20 megabytes!
>
> https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk
Sample build log sizes:
PPC64 fastdebug, 200 kilobytes:
https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-ppc64le-fastdebug.log
S390X fastdebug, 20 megabytes!
https://builds.shipilev.net/openjdk-jdk/build-logs/build-linux-s390x-server-fastdebug.log
S390X slowdebug, 200 megab
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:40:12 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> If you try to build `linux-mipsel-zero-fastdebug`, this happens:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I think it relates to
> [JDK-8253970](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8253970) that
> introduced `atomic_compare_exchange` on those paths,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:10:43 GMT, Ao Qi wrote:
>> Thanks, I'll wait for either of @glaubitz, @theaoqi or @xiangzhai to confirm
>> this fixes the native `mipsel` builds for them, and then integrate.
>
> The native build of linux-mipsel-zero-release passed. I only have mips64el
> and 64-bit OS, s
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 08:43:31 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by ihse (Reviewer).
>
> Thanks, I'll wait for either of @glaubitz, @theaoqi or @xiangzhai to confirm
> this fixes the native `mipsel` builds for them, and then integrate.
The native build of linux-mipsel-zero-releas
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:10:04 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> With the default constructors warnings in java.desktop and jdk.accessibility
> now fixed, the warning should be enabled in the build for those modules.
Looks good!
Thank you for your continued efforts to clean up the code base.
---
15 matches
Mail list logo