[11u] RFR: 8257633: Missing -mmacosx-version-min=X flag when linking libjvm

2021-01-14 Thread Doerr, Martin
Hi, JDK-8257633 is backported to 11.0.11-oracle. I'd like to backport it for parity. Change doesn't apply cleanly because of an unrelated context change in the neighboring code. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257633 Original change:

Integrated: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

2021-01-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace > archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for > details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as

Re: RFR: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh [v2]

2021-01-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:45:43 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> Jamil Nimeh has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Minor grammatical fixes > > src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security line 455: > >> 453: #max_retries and

Re: RFR: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh [v2]

2021-01-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
> This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace > archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for > details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as follows: > > - blacklisted.certs -> blocked.certs (along

Re: RFR: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

2021-01-14 Thread Sean Mullan
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace > archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for > details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as

Re: RFR: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

2021-01-14 Thread Weijun Wang
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace > archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for > details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as

Re: RFR: 8253866: Security Libs Terminology Refresh

2021-01-14 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:32:37 GMT, Jamil Nimeh wrote: > This is the security libs portion of the effort to replace > archaic/non-inclusive words with more neutral terms (see JDK-8253315 for > details). > > Here are the changes covering core libraries code and tests. Terms were > changed as