On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 00:13:41 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson
wrote:
> Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 4a7ccf36
Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/4a7ccf36e9a3978c437db3efe892dd23e8a0b772
Stats: 388 l
Forwardport JDK 17 -> JDK 18
-
Commit messages:
- Merge
- 8270025: DynamicCallSiteDesc::withArgs doesn't throw NPE
- 8270184: [TESTBUG] Add coverage for jvmci ResolvedJavaType.toJavaName() for
lambdas
- 8269281: java/foreign/Test{Down,Up}call.java time out
- 8269635: Stress test
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 19:02:04 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> This patch adds copying of element-list files generated for jdk.javadoc to
> the interim langtools version of jdk.javadoc. I'm also refactoring the
> jdk.javadoc/Gendata.gmk file a bit to better adhere to current build infra
> standards a
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 08:26:21 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> This patch adds copying of element-list files generated for jdk.javadoc to
>> the interim langtools version of jdk.javadoc. I'm also refactoring the
>> jdk.javadoc/Gendata.gmk file a bit to better adhere to current build infra
>> standa
> This patch adds copying of element-list files generated for jdk.javadoc to
> the interim langtools version of jdk.javadoc. I'm also refactoring the
> jdk.javadoc/Gendata.gmk file a bit to better adhere to current build infra
> standards as this was missed in the original review of this file. R
On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 20:13:56 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> This patch adds copying of element-list files generated for jdk.javadoc to
>> the interim langtools version of jdk.javadoc. I'm also refactoring the
>> jdk.javadoc/Gendata.gmk file a bit to better adhere to current build infra
>> stan
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 11:10:26 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This patch adds copying of element-list files generated for jdk.javadoc to
>> the interim langtools version of jdk.javadoc. I'm also refactoring the
>> jdk.javadoc/Gendata.gmk file a bit to better adhere to current build infra
>> s
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 21:46:26 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> It is still unsettling that we don't know what changed
More as an FYI and something that might help investigate similar failures in
future. Each run of the GitHub action job generates a log which is available
for download publicly (and/or
