very helpful.
I would think you'll have better luck on Linux + gcc than me on Mac,
although icc claims compatible with llvm too.
Let me know if you succeed!
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 9:37 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-12-18 00:05, August Nag
the tests show that Os/O2 is
>no different than O3,
>- who knows if this will be true in the future.
>-
>
>
>
> What alternatives do you have in mind ?
>
>
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* August Nagro
> *Sent:* Mittwoch, 18. Dezem
I compiled with clang since I'm on Mac.
The Renaissance benchmark suite is also a good one that I learned about
recently.
My opinion is that there are probably more compelling alternatives if
reducing binary size is the goal. Even if the tests show that Os/O2 is no
different than O3, who knows
I published some benchmarks of OpenJDK on Mac with Ofast and O3 [1]. Some
microbenchmarks like Netty’s HttpObjectEncoder experienced >100% speedup with
O3, and the more real-world Dacapo suite was ~15% improvement over O2 (which is
exactly the same as Os). I did include a few other flags,
