On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:06:24 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> would a jep unneeded be enough to "unstuck" this PR?
Yes if no bug. Conceptually, the `/jep unneeded` will behave as no jep command.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7888
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:10:57 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-424 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] -
Hi jie,
The same problem occurred in my PR[1].
And this problem began yesterday and only affects newly issued PRs(about 5
PRs now).
Similar problems have occurred in the past(also on *weekends*).
The maintainers may fix it quickly during working time.
CC'ing skara-...@openjdk.java.net
[1]
Hi Manavjeet,
Glad to see that your issue has been solved.
FYI:
I found your last email was only sent to me and not sent(or CC) to `
build-dev@openjdk.java.net`.
It makes it impossible for others to receive and reply to your email. Just
a reminder for you.
---
Best Regards,
Guoxiong.
On Sat,
pot-gc-...@openjdk.java.net.
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 7:44 PM Guoxiong Li wrote:
>
>> Hi Manavjeet,
>>
>> It seems like an issue about building. Could you move this thread to
>> build-dev@openjdk.java.net ?
>> We can continue the discussion there.
>>
&
