Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request for review : FreeType embedded in OSX packages

2012-10-17 Thread Henri Gomez
2012/10/17 Phil Race : > I filed : (JDK-8001065) [macosx] OpenJDK on OS X should use bundled > freetype, not one from the system > > Sample code is just > > import java.awt.Font; > public class CreateFont { > > public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception { >Font f = Font.createFont(

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request for review : FreeType embedded in OSX packages

2012-10-17 Thread Henri Gomez
ont via > Font.createFont(), > that should trigger it. > > -phil. > > On 10/17/12 9:18 AM, Phil Race wrote: >> On 10/17/12 1:11 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>>> You need to create a bug at <http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/> >>>> describing wh

Re: Request for review : FreeType embedded in OSX packages

2012-10-17 Thread Henri Gomez
Only tried it with old build system. Le 17 oct. 2012 à 18:18, Phil Race a écrit : > On 10/17/12 1:11 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>> You need to create a bug at <http://bugreport.sun.com/bugreport/> >>> describing what you want to change, and then attach a new patch.

Re: debuginfo/diz files in built images

2012-09-05 Thread Henri Gomez
Interesting point. Should .diz files be removed when packaging JDK/JRE for Linux ? 2012/9/5 David Holmes : > Dan, > > Sorry, not meaning to ruffle your feathers. > > The reason I say the diz-in-image story is unclear is because there are no > explicit rules that indicates that diz files should en

Re: OpenJDK 7u and Fedora 17

2012-08-29 Thread Henri Gomez
I understand you both :-) Andrew, as distro packager, is rebuilding OpenJDK and package it for distros he maintain. So he's sure that stdlibc++ used at runtime will be same as one at build time and he could even mandate it in its RPM spec file so it will be installed by yum if not available. For

Re: RFR (S): 7178667: ALT_EXPORT_PATH does not export server jvm on macosx

2012-06-22 Thread Henri Gomez
> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/MACOSX_PORT-521 > > On 22.06.2012, at 09:08, Henri Gomez wrote: > >>> Staffan and Henri, >>> >>> I think you guys are talking about different levels of support >>> for MacOS X Universal builds. Staffan's change is i

Re: RFR (S): 7178667: ALT_EXPORT_PATH does not export server jvm on macosx

2012-06-22 Thread Henri Gomez
> Staffan and Henri, > > I think you guys are talking about different levels of support > for MacOS X Universal builds. Staffan's change is in HotSpot > which has supported MacOS X Universal builds for a while now. > > Henri is talking about the forest of repos which does not > currently support Ma

Re: RFR (S): 7178667: ALT_EXPORT_PATH does not export server jvm on macosx

2012-06-21 Thread Henri Gomez
universal build, on OSX ? Happy to see that some works/fixes around it :) BTW, how did you get in trouble since universal build is disabled for now unless some code is added to : There was an old thread on jdk7u-dev list and a proposed patch for review (http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/sv

Re: Request for Review: Add Mac OS X Instructions to README-builds.html

2012-04-26 Thread Henri Gomez
X11 support will be removed in Mountain Lion : http://www.macrumors.com/2012/02/17/apple-removes-x11-in-os-x-mountain-lion-shifts-support-to-open-source-xquartz/ There is some dependencies required on OpenJDK like FreeType. libfontmanager.dylib: @rpath/libfontmanager.dylib (compatibility

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-04-21 Thread Henri Gomez
> Yes, please have a look here: > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/build-infra/guide.html > for detailed instructions. I took a look this afternoon. I'll experiment it soon. thanks

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-04-21 Thread Henri Gomez
drik > > 2012/4/21 Martijn Verburg : >> Hi Henri, >> >> I believe so yes, Fredrik does have a Mac after all ;-) >> >> Cheers, >> Martijn >> >> >> On 21 April 2012 12:34, Henri Gomez wrote: >>> >>> New build system has be

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-04-21 Thread Henri Gomez
New build system has been tested allready on OSX ? Le 21 avr. 2012 à 09:10, Fredrik Öhrström a écrit : > For the new build you have to explicitly choose release,fastdebug or > slowdebug. > (--with-debug-level=release,fastdebug or slowdebug) > So you do not need to turn off fastdebug, it default

Re: Successfully building 32- and 64-bit OpenJDK 8 on WinXP/64bit with free tools only

2011-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
> Hi Henri, Hi Stephen > All my scripts for building and testing mlvm are here: > http://gist.github.com/243072 Seen. I learn many things from your scripts from OpenJDK 7 (bsd-port) in the past :) > They work on my Mac OS X 10.6.8 system. Same here > MLVM is based on jdk8 but also uses a ant

Re: Successfully building 32- and 64-bit OpenJDK 8 on WinXP/64bit with free tools only

2011-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
; http://www.concord.org/~sbannasch/mlvm/java-1.8.0-internal-mlvm-2011_10_22.tar.gz > > Stephen - could you perhaps post news of your builds to these > mailgroups as well? > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >>

Re: Successfully building 32- and 64-bit OpenJDK 8 on WinXP/64bit with free tools only

2011-10-29 Thread Henri Gomez
Interesting. Wondering if we could do the same for OS/X. Is it supported allready ? 2011/10/28 Volker Simonis : > Hi, > > I've put together a short description on how to build both, a 64- and > a 32-bit version of OpenJDK 8 on a plain, vanilla WindowsXP 64-bit > operating system using only free