Re: RFR: race with nested repos in hgforest.sh

2013-02-06 Thread Neil Richards
fwiw, I've always found the attempts by hg_forest to process things in parallel cause me more pain than it's worth. Marching through the repo locations serially in order might take a few moments longer elapsed time, but creates instantly understandable status / output / log and points for returnin

Re: Code Review Request: CR 6988099 Add version information to jvmti demos.

2011-11-03 Thread Neil Richards
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 12:29 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > It will be important that you create the changeset using the latest jdk8 build > forest, e.g. using a clones from http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build > Once you are happy that the change is ok on your system, then bundle up the > changese

Re: Code Review Request: CR 6988099 Add version information to jvmti demos.

2011-11-02 Thread Neil Richards
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:07 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > Hi Neil, > > My understanding is that you need to have at least two reviewers who > have 'reviewer' privilege, (and I don't have 'reviewer' privilege). > I had a quick leaf through the OpenJDK Bylaws. It looks like the number of necessary

Re: Code Review Request: CR 6988099 Add version information to jvmti demos.

2011-11-02 Thread Neil Richards
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:21 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > Looks good. > > > -kto > Hi Zhengyu, Given Kelly's blessing, are you now happy to push this change to jdk8? (If you're otherwise tied up, I can drive the mechanics of the push if you provide me with a suitable java bug id to use.) Regar

Re: Add version information to jvmti demos.

2011-09-15 Thread Neil Richards
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:14 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote: > No progress been made. Any reason should be resolved right away? > > Thanks, > > -Zhengyu > > On 9/15/2011 2:50 AM, Sean Chou wrote: > > Hi, > > About this bug, is there any progressing ? > > > > > > 2011/6/8 Zhengyu Gu > >

Re: Request for review: Store convenience scripts as executable

2011-08-03 Thread Neil Richards
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 08:33 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote: > Although the jcheck extension isn't publicly available (it will be someday), > it is used on the servers > and by developers. That extension disallows ANY file from having execute > permissions. > So this changeset would get blocked, or cre

Request for review: Store convenience scripts as executable

2011-07-20 Thread Neil Richards
hanks, Neil -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU # HG changeset patch # User Neil Richards , # Date 1311153869