Hi,
Could I +1 a request for this to be fixed. I appreciate it is harmless, but it
is an annoyance and it is just going to be a source of bug reports forever:-)
If you wish I can author a changeset for this.
Regards,
Ed.
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:49 +0100, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Hi Johnathan,
OK, I'll prepare a change :)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Edward Nevill wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I +1 a request for this to be fixed. I appreciate it is harmless, but
> it is an annoyance and it is just going to be a source of bug reports
> forever:-)
>
> If you wish I can author a changeset f
Thanks for the opening the bug report.
I've triaged it but as I can not push it anyway, I leave the fix for
the interested reader :)
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> Volker,
>
> Thanks for the great analysis! Your trivial fix seems reasonable. I opened
> https://bugs
Volker,
Thanks for the great analysis! Your trivial fix seems reasonable. I
opened https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8141416 to track this.
It's up for grabs to add that line. :) (Otherwise I'll fix it when I
have the time.)
/Magnus
On 2015-11-04 08:49, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi John
Hi Johnathan,
this is a known problem - at least to me :)
It is caused by a peculiarity of the gcc version on Ubuntu where "gcc
-dumpversion" doesn't print a micro-version:
Ubuntu:
$ gcc -dumpversion
4.6
Any other Linux:
$ gcc -dumpversion
4.8.3
This "feature" is tracked under
https://bugs.lau
I'm seeing a bunch of "syntax error"s on an otherwise successful build
of jdk9/dev.
This is on Ubuntu Linux, 14.04.
Is this a known problem; should I be worried?
-- Jon
Creating support/jce/policy/unlimited/US_export_policy.jar
Creating support/jce/policy/limited/local_policy.jar
Creating sup
