On 2022-04-14 19:42, Andrew Hughes wrote:
On 12:57 Wed 13 Apr , Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I disagree completely. We had it this way in mainline originally, but it
was fixed in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256393.
Prior to this patch, it seems there were no GCC version requirem
On 06:25 Wed 13 Apr , Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > > > One dummy question:
> > > > Why do we need to specify the real package name here?
> > > > If we install gcc-10, I think apt system will pick up the latest gcc-10
> > > > for us.
> > >
> > > IIRC the intent is to keep contro
On 12:57 Wed 13 Apr , Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I disagree completely. We had it this way in mainline originally, but it
> was fixed in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256393.
>
Prior to this patch, it seems there were no GCC version requirements.
That's not what I'm suggesting.
Langer, Christoph ; Andrew Hughes
> ; David Holmes ;
> Aleksey Shipilev
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Why we use specific compiler versions - was: Re: JDK-8284772 - was
> RE: [jdk17] RFR: 8269148: Update minor GCC version in GitHub Actions
> pipeline
>
> I d
I disagree completely. We had it this way in mainline originally, but it
was fixed in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8256393.
As you might know, I'm not too fond of the GHA solution, since we can't
debug issues with Github's hosts. Nevertheless, many users look at the
GHA results as
Hi Andrew,
> > > One dummy question:
> > > Why do we need to specify the real package name here?
> > > If we install gcc-10, I think apt system will pick up the latest gcc-10
> > > for us.
> >
> > IIRC the intent is to keep control over the gcc version and not
> > randomly update whenever the dis
On 09:22 Wed 23 Jun , David Holmes wrote:
> On 23/06/2021 5:38 am, Xin Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev
> > wrote:
> >
> >> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail
> >> with e.g.:
> >>
> >>
> >> The following packages have unme
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On 23/06/2021 10:23 am, Xin Liu wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
e.g.:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On 23/06/2021 5:38 am, Xin Liu wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
e.g.:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:20:14 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
> e.g.:
>
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
> 10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cros
It seems Ubuntu had bumped the version for GCC, so GHA started to fail with
e.g.:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
g++-10-s390x-linux-gnu : Depends: gcc-10-s390x-linux-gnu-base (=
10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04cross1) but 10.3.0-1ubuntu1~20.04cross1 is to be installed
gcc-10-s390x-linux
17 matches
Mail list logo
