Hmmm, it was indeed originated as a new clone immediately followed by an
'update -r jdk8-b73' to take it back to the previous level, or so I thought.
You can probably tell that I was under the impression that the commands
'clone -r level' and 'clone && update -r level' were equivalent ...
self-evi
On 5/7/2014 11:18 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
... having said that though, with the benefit of a little hindsight
and the application of not a little CM common sense, isn't there a
shortfall in Mercurial in as much as I would expect an update to b73
to remove nashorn as a sub-repo from the forest
... having said that though, with the benefit of a little hindsight and the
application of not a little CM common sense, isn't there a shortfall in
Mercurial in as much as I would expect an update to b73 to remove nashorn
as a sub-repo from the forest since it wasn't present when the tag was
create
Thanx for the fast response, Dave - reply duly noted and indeed promulgated
:-)
Thanx again ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work before we count the
cost and before we we judge rightly of our strength to go thro' with it -
Robinson Crusoe
On 7 May
On 5/7/2014 10:18 AM, Dave Pointon wrote:
Greetings fellow builders ,
I have a question, as the subject suggests, regarding the version of the
nashorn repo - specifically, one of my current tasks is to attempt to build
OJDK level jdk8-b73 but I can't find that level/tag in the nashorn repo.
Is