On 2013-12-18 19:08, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi Magnus,
Is this formalized some place ? If not it would be good to get this
formalized and
posted on a wiki or at http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/
You are absolutely correct, they should be in a better place. And now
they are! (Better la
Hi Magnus,
Is this formalized some place ? If not it would be good to get this
formalized and
posted on a wiki or at http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/
Thanks
Kumar
On 10/8/2013 12:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Whitespace and indentation in makefiles is a more problematic area
than f
build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: Code conventions for the build system
On 2013-10-08 14:08, Salter, Thomas A wrote:
> Was there any thought given to using this GNU Make feature to get rid of
> significant tab characters, or is it not even possible in all the supported
> build environ
On 2013-10-08 14:08, Salter, Thomas A wrote:
Was there any thought given to using this GNU Make feature to get rid of
significant tab characters, or is it not even possible in all the supported
build environments? Some of the legacy systems I deal with don't handle tab
characters well.
From:
rom: Magnus Ihse Bursie
Subject: Code conventions for the build system
To: build-dev
Message-ID: <5253b6ec.9020...@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Whitespace and indentation in makefiles is a more problematic area than
for other languages. Even while
Hi Magnus,
great work!
I completely agree with all points and especially like the indentation
level of two spaces:)
Thanks,
Volker
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> Whitespace and indentation in makefiles is a more problematic area than for
> other languages. Even whi
Whitespace and indentation in makefiles is a more problematic area than
for other languages. Even while most of the time whitespace is not
significant, sometimes is is. This might be considered a design flaw in
make, but that's not something we can do anything about. In particular,
initial tabs