> -Simon
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Christoph
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: build-dev On Behalf Of
> Erik
> >> Joelsson
> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2019 17:10
> >> To: David Holmes ; Simon Tooke
>
Erik, Simon,
Thanks for clarifying things. It would have been somewhat clearer if a
new bug for the space-in-path problem has been filed rather then
reopening the existing issue.
Cheers,
David
On 13/09/2019 1:10 am, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello David,
The initial report was about this constr
-
>> From: build-dev On Behalf Of Erik
>> Joelsson
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 12. September 2019 17:10
>> To: David Holmes ; Simon Tooke
>> ; build-dev
>> Subject: Re: JDK 14 RFR: 8216354: Syntax error in toolchain_windows.m4
>>
>> Hello David,
>&
Simon Tooke
> ; build-dev
> Subject: Re: JDK 14 RFR: 8216354: Syntax error in toolchain_windows.m4
>
> Hello David,
>
> The initial report was about this construct not working at all, as Bash
> will not expand wildcards inside of quotes:
>
> "$with_ucrt_dll_dir/*.dl
Hello David,
The initial report was about this construct not working at all, as Bash
will not expand wildcards inside of quotes:
"$with_ucrt_dll_dir/*.dll"
In 13 I changed that to remove the quotes to make the statement work at
all. The drawback then, as Simon pointed out, was that if
$with
On 9/11/2019 6:07 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Simon, Erik,
>
> I'm a bit confused. Initially 8216354 was reported as already being
> fixed by 8215445. But the fix proposed here actually reverts a change
> from 8215445 which means that far from fixing this issue, 8215445
> actually introduced it
Hi Simon, Erik,
I'm a bit confused. Initially 8216354 was reported as already being
fixed by 8215445. But the fix proposed here actually reverts a change
from 8215445 which means that far from fixing this issue, 8215445
actually introduced it - correct?
But 8215445 was only fixed in 13 - no
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2019-09-11 10:55, Simon Tooke wrote:
This is a trivial fix that has been sitting around since JDK8.
At one time, 8216354 was marked "won't fix", but I've seen people
(including myself) run up against this issue enough that I think it
should be addressed. It's been reopene
This is a trivial fix that has been sitting around since JDK8.
At one time, 8216354 was marked "won't fix", but I've seen people
(including myself) run up against this issue enough that I think it
should be addressed. It's been reopened, and I have a webrev ready that
I've tested in the jdk repo
