gt; d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier,
> Goetz
> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
> Hello Matthias and Christoph.
> Thank you for your explanations.
>
> I did not have enough kn
g, XLC 13 has a bug or maybe just sume
specific
required symbols are not declared correctly?
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Ichiroh Takiguchi [mailto:taki...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2018 09:55
> To: Langer, Christoph
> Cc: Baes
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Freitag, 1. Juni 2018 10:57
> To: Ichiroh Takiguchi
> Cc: Baesken, Matthias ; 'build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net' ; ppc-aix-port-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier,
> Goetz
> Subject: RE: RFR : 82023
anger, Christoph
> Cc: Baesken, Matthias ; 'build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net' ; ppc-aix-port-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Lindenmaier,
> Goetz
> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
> Hel
thias
Sent: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 09:06
To: Langer, Christoph ;
'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' ;
ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz
Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on
xlc 12.1
Hi Christoph can
02322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc 12.1
Hi Christoph can I add you as second reviewer (other reviewer was Erik
Joelsson) can push the change ?
Best regards, Matthias
From: Langer, Christoph
Sent: Donnerstag, 26. April 2018 16:38
To: Baesken, Matthias
mailto:matthias.baes.
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: Simonis, Volker
Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc 12.1
Hi Matthias,
to me the change in principal looks good.
I'm wondering if it is possible to do a comparison like xlc < 13 (e.g. extract
major number before t
monis ; Baesken, Matthias
>> ; Simonis, Volker ;
>> ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; build-
>> d...@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not supp
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Langer, Christoph
> wrote:
&g
> -----Original Message-
>> >> From: build-dev [mailto:build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >> Thomas Stüfe
>> >> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2018 06:55
>> >> To: Volker Simonis ; Baesken, Matthias
>> &g
mail.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2018 09:21
> To: Langer, Christoph
> Cc: Volker Simonis ; Baesken, Matthias
> ; Simonis, Volker ;
> ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibi
> Sent: Freitag, 27. April 2018 06:55
>> To: Volker Simonis ; Baesken, Matthias
>>
>> Cc: Simonis, Volker ; ppc-aix-port-
>> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; build-
>> d...@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility fla
uild-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
> Hi,
>
> This was added by "8200178: Remove mapfiles for JDK native libraries".
> But if the flag is not accepted, what is the default behavior? Do we
wrote: -
>> To: "Langer, Christoph" ,
>> "'build-dev@openjdk.java.net'" ,
>> "ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net" ,
>> "core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net"
>> From: "Baesken, Matthias"
>> Date: 04/26/2018
Looks ok.
/Erik
On 2018-04-26 07:13, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hello , could you please review this small adjustment to the symbol
visibility compilation settings on AIX ?
Currently we use XLC 12.1 to compile JDK on AIX .
However XLC 12.1 does not support the "-qvisibility=hidden"
t; ,
> "core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net"
> From: "Baesken, Matthias"
> Date: 04/26/2018 08:23PM
> Cc: "Simonis, Volker" , Bhaktavatsal R Maram
>
> Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
>
> Hello Chr
;'build-dev@openjdk.java.net'" ,
"ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net" ,
"core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net"
From: "Baesken, Matthias"
Date: 04/26/2018 08:23PM
Cc: "Simonis, Volker" , Bhaktavatsal R Maram
Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol
va.net'
; ppc-aix-port-...@openjdk.java.net;
core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: Simonis, Volker
Subject: RE: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc 12.1
Hi Matthias,
to me the change in principal looks good.
I'm wondering if it is possible to do a comparison
Hi Matthias,
to me the change in principal looks good.
I'm wondering if it is possible to do a comparison like xlc < 13 (e.g. extract
major number before the first dot, then compare numerically) - but maybe it is
too complicated and the current single version compare suits our needs ?
Best reg
16:32
> To: Baesken, Matthias
> Cc: 'build-dev@openjdk.java.net' ; ppc-aix-
> port-...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net; Simonis,
> Volker
> Subject: Re: RFR : 8202322: AIX: symbol visibility flags not support on xlc
> 12.1
>
> Hi Matthias,
Hi Matthias,
Its right in time. I am facing "Undefined Symbol" errors with XLC 13.1 due to
"-qvisibility=hidden" which hides all symbols by default. I workaround that by
removing this flag
-bash-4.4$ xlC -qversion
IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V13.1.3 (5725-C72, 5765-J07)
Version: 13.01.0003.
Look
Hi Matthias,
I would prefer a numerical comparison to version < 13. Otherwise the
code looks like you want to just exclude 12.1 for some reason when in
reality you want to omit the flag for any compiler older than xlc 13.
Best Regards, Thomas
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Baesken, Matthias
22 matches
Mail list logo
