--Original Message-
>> From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
>> Sent: Montag, 17. Dezember 2018 16:11
>> To: Baesken, Matthias
>> Cc: 2d-...@openjdk.java.net; erik.joels...@oracle.com; build-
>> d...@openjdk.java.net; awt-...@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D
16:11
To: Baesken, Matthias
Cc: 2d-...@openjdk.java.net; erik.joels...@oracle.com; build-
d...@openjdk.java.net; awt-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
Solaris
Sounds like a simpler change, at least for now. Does it pass jdk-submit? Do
you
nJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
Solaris
Message-ID: <5874d10e-db2d-8681-a54b-a1eeb6e45...@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 2018-12-14 12:49, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
13 dec. 2018 kl. 19:07 skrev Erik Joelsson mailto:er
.@oracle.com; build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; awt-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
> Solaris
>
> Sounds like a simpler change, at least for now. Does it pass jdk-submit? Do
> you intend to push to 12 or 13?
>
> Looks
To: Baesken, Matthias ; 2d-
d...@openjdk.java.net; erik.joels...@oracle.com; 'build-
d...@openjdk.java.net' ; awt-
d...@openjdk.java.net; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
Solaris
On 18/12/2018 6:02 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hi
s
> >// decl.
> >int a = 1;
> >printf("a: %d \n", a);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
> > Best regards, Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: David Holmes
> >>
18 01:24
To: Baesken, Matthias ; 2d-
d...@openjdk.java.net; erik.joels...@oracle.com; 'build-
d...@openjdk.java.net' ; awt-
d...@openjdk.java.net; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
Solaris
Our internal builds pass okay.
David
On 18/12/2
.joels...@oracle.com; 'build-
> d...@openjdk.java.net' ; awt-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; 'magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com'
>
> Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
> Solaris
>
> Our internal builds pass okay.
>
> David
>
> On 18/12/201
17. Dezember 2018 16:11
>> To: Baesken, Matthias
>> Cc: 2d-...@openjdk.java.net; erik.joels...@oracle.com; build-
>> d...@openjdk.java.net; awt-...@openjdk.java.net
>> Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
>> Solaris
>>
>> Sounds
, Matthias
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:39:26 +0100
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
To: Erik Joelsson , build-dev
, "awt-...@openjdk.java.net"
, 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK
: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:39:26 +0100
From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
To: Erik Joelsson , build-dev
, "awt-...@openjdk.java.net"
, 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
Solaris
Message-ID: <5874
awt-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] JDK-8215296 do not disable c99 on
> Solaris
>
> Sounds like a simpler change, at least for now. Does it pass jdk-submit? Do
> you intend to push to 12 or 13?
>
> Looks good to me, as long as it doesn't break anything.
>
ng/awt .
>
>
> Thanks, Matthias
>
>
>> --
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:39:26 +0100
>> From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
>> To: Erik Joelsson , build-dev
>> , "awt-...@openjdk.java.net"
>> , 2d-dev <2
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:39:26 +0100
> From: Magnus Ihse Bursie
> To: Erik Joelsson , build-dev
> , "awt-...@openjdk.java.net"
> , 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subjec
14 matches
Mail list logo
