Phil,
I've tested it on the clean Windows 7 virtual machine with only VS2010
installed as well on a number of configurations with and without DXSDK
(even on my VS2012 only setup).
Thanks,
Vadim
On 09.09.2013 19:49, Phil Race wrote:
Seems fine to me given that the versions are identical acros
Seems fine to me given that the versions are identical across all SDKs
we might use.
Also since this simply removes a required build component, there should
be no
'flag day' where people need to be given notice to install a new build
component.
I think you said that you didn't have the standalon
On 2013-09-06 22:21, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote:
Hi all,
Please review the fix for this bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8008022
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8008022/webrev.00/
The new build part of the change looks good. (I have not looked at the
old build files.)
Always nice
I can't be a reviewer for this change but I do want to support it.
I'd be happy to see this rudimentary dependency go away.
Ideally I would like to see later a back port to JDK7.
Ivan
On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Vadim Pakhnushev
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review the fix for this bug:
> ht
Hi all,
Please review the fix for this bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8008022
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vadim/8008022/webrev.00/
I've found that all needed DirectX 9 SDK files (that is, d3d9.h,
dsound.h and dsound.lib) are included in the Windows SDK 7.0a shipped
with Visual St
