On Apr 22 2014, at 01:27 , Staffan Larsen wrote:
> I ran the patch on OS X and it worked there too. Thanks!
>
> You mention “status code from subprocesses” which got me thinking of a
> problem I frequently run into when I have some uncommitted changes in one of
> the repos:
>
>
> On 22 Apr 2014, at 09:10, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Seems to work for me too. Nice speedup! Looks good to me.
+1. Thanks for doing these improvements Mike.
-Chris.
>
> /Erik
>
>> On 2014-04-19 01:21, Mike Duigou wrote:
>> Hello all;
>>
>> This is an improvement to hgforest to increase it
I ran the patch on OS X and it worked there too. Thanks!
You mention “status code from subprocesses” which got me thinking of a problem
I frequently run into when I have some uncommitted changes in one of the repos:
...
.: searching for changes
Seems to work for me too. Nice speedup! Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2014-04-19 01:21, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
This is an improvement to hgforest to increase it's concurrency behaviour.
Currently hgforest.sh limits the rate at which it starts new sub-processes
because it wants to limit t
Hello all;
This is an improvement to hgforest to increase it's concurrency behaviour.
Currently hgforest.sh limits the rate at which it starts new sub-processes
because it wants to limit the number of concurrent tasks. The naive approach it
takes can cause unnecessary delays. For sequences of o
