On May 9 2014, at 03:54 , pointo1d point...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike ,
On 09/05/14 03:19, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
This issue is a follow-on bug fix to JDK-8041151 (Improve hgforest.sh
concurrency). That changeset introduced use of fifos for monitoring
sub-shell completion and
On May 9 2014, at 01:54 , pointo1d point...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike ,
On 09/05/14 08:25, Mike Duigou wrote:
On May 8 2014, at 22:35 , Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
Looks fine to me Mike.
Trivially while you are there (not related to your changes), or i can do it
On May 8 2014, at 22:35 , Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
Looks fine to me Mike.
Trivially while you are there (not related to your changes), or i can do it
separately, --sequentially now runs with up to two parallel commands.
Ah sorry, I know why that is. It is due to
Hi Mike ,
On 09/05/14 08:25, Mike Duigou wrote:
On May 8 2014, at 22:35 , Chris Hegarty chris.hega...@oracle.com wrote:
Looks fine to me Mike.
Trivially while you are there (not related to your changes), or i can do it
separately, --sequentially now runs with up to two parallel commands.
Hi Mike ,
On 09/05/14 03:19, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
This issue is a follow-on bug fix to JDK-8041151 (Improve hgforest.sh concurrency). That
changeset introduced use of fifos for monitoring sub-shell completion and included an
alternative implementation for configurations which did
Hello all;
This issue is a follow-on bug fix to JDK-8041151 (Improve hgforest.sh
concurrency). That changeset introduced use of fifos for monitoring sub-shell
completion and included an alternative implementation for configurations which
did not properly support fifos. This changeset detects
Looks fine to me Mike.
Trivially while you are there (not related to your changes), or i can do it
separately, --sequentially now runs with up to two parallel commands.
-Chris
On 9 May 2014, at 03:19, Mike Duigou mike.dui...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello all;
This issue is a follow-on bug
