Thanks Erik!
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 11:48, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> /Erik
>
>
> On 2017-01-16 09:24, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> When the failure handler invokes lldb to create a core it looks something
>> like this:
>>
>> lldb -o 'attach %p' -o 'process save-core core.%p'
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2017-01-16 09:24, Staffan Larsen wrote:
When the failure handler invokes lldb to create a core it looks something like
this:
lldb -o 'attach %p' -o 'process save-core core.%p' -o 'detach' -o 'quit'
However if the attach command fails, the rest of the commands - in
Thanks Dmitry!
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 09:43, Dmitry Samersoff
> wrote:
>
> Staffan,
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> -Dmitry
>
>
> On 2017-01-16 11:24, Staffan Larsen wrote:
>> When the failure handler invokes lldb to create a core it looks something
>> like this:
>>
>> lldb -o 'attach %p' -o 'proc
Staffan,
Looks OK to me.
-Dmitry
On 2017-01-16 11:24, Staffan Larsen wrote:
> When the failure handler invokes lldb to create a core it looks something
> like this:
>
> lldb -o 'attach %p' -o 'process save-core core.%p' -o 'detach' -o 'quit'
>
> However if the attach command fails, the res
When the failure handler invokes lldb to create a core it looks something like
this:
lldb -o 'attach %p' -o 'process save-core core.%p' -o 'detach' -o 'quit'
However if the attach command fails, the rest of the commands - including
'quit' - are not being run. This means the lldb process is hu
