Creating some other makefiles was not planned as a part of this JEP, Phil.
If the demos are used for testing, do you want me do turn them into manual
tests?
Shura
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 2:45 PM, Phil Race wrote:
>
> And to be clear, the provision for still building these client demos needs to
And to be clear, the provision for still building these client demos
needs to be made BEFORE this is pushed.
Or at least as *part* of this push.
Else we will be unable to perform our normal integration testing at this
critical juncture of JDK 9 ..
-phil.
On 03/03/2017 09:39 AM, Phil Race wrot
What is the plan for ensuring there is still a way to build the client
demos - which are not being removed
but just moved. Doesn't this makefile need to be somewhere still ?
-phil.
On 3/3/2017 12:18 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-03-02 20:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
Hi,
Could y
On 2017-03-02 20:33, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
Hi,
Could you be so kind to review suggested changes for the makefiles to stop
producing sales and demos bundle. Pls note that this request only changes the
makefiles, it does not remove demos and samples source code, which will be done
sepa
Hi,
Could you be so kind to review suggested changes for the makefiles to stop
producing sales and demos bundle. Pls note that this request only changes the
makefiles, it does not remove demos and samples source code, which will be done
separately.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
