Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-26 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi Alan, Thanks for the comments! A question inline. On 25.6.2015 18:38, Alan Bateman wrote: On 25/06/2015 17:25, Jan Lahoda wrote: Hello, Based on the feedback I've received so far, I've uploaded an updated version of the patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8080679/webrev.01/full/

Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-26 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Jan, Build changes look good. /Erik On 2015-06-25 18:25, Jan Lahoda wrote: Hello, Based on the feedback I've received so far, I've uploaded an updated version of the patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8080679/webrev.01/full/ Notable changes: -avoided the dependency on java.de

Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-25 Thread Alan Bateman
On 25/06/2015 17:25, Jan Lahoda wrote: Hello, Based on the feedback I've received so far, I've uploaded an updated version of the patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8080679/webrev.01/full/ Notable changes: -avoided the dependency on java.desktop and java.datatransfer -adjusted the n

Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-25 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hello, Based on the feedback I've received so far, I've uploaded an updated version of the patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8080679/webrev.01/full/ Notable changes: -avoided the dependency on java.desktop and java.datatransfer -adjusted the native library build script as per Erik's r

Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-22 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi Erik, Thanks for the comments. Yes, I copied an existing file, and -DUSE_MMAP seems unnecessary. I'll implement your suggestions. Thanks, Jan On 22.6.2015 10:25, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello Jan, Build changes look mostly ok. Some notes: * "$(CFLAGS_WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS)", which should

Re: RFR: JDK-8080679: Include jline in JDK for Java and JavaScript REPLs

2015-06-22 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello Jan, Build changes look mostly ok. Some notes: * "$(CFLAGS_WARNINGS_ARE_ERRORS)", which should not be used anymore. Warnings are already treated as errors globally. * There should not be a need to add "-I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I$(JDK_OUTPUTDIR)/include/$(OPENJDK_TARGET_OS)" to cflags. INCLUDED