Re: RFR: JDK-8168772 Convert javadoc generation to build-infra standards

2016-10-26 Thread Erik Joelsson
Looks good. /Erik On 2016-10-26 15:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2016-10-26 14:31, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, Looks good in general. * The REGEXP parameter is weirdly named. I realize you didn't introduce this name, but I think we should call it something better since it's clearly not

Re: RFR: JDK-8168772 Convert javadoc generation to build-infra standards

2016-10-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2016-10-26 14:31, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, Looks good in general. * The REGEXP parameter is weirdly named. I realize you didn't introduce this name, but I think we should call it something better since it's clearly not a regular expression. PACKAGE_FILTER perhaps? You're absolutely righ

Re: RFR: JDK-8168772 Convert javadoc generation to build-infra standards

2016-10-26 Thread Erik Joelsson
Hello, Looks good in general. * The REGEXP parameter is weirdly named. I realize you didn't introduce this name, but I think we should call it something better since it's clearly not a regular expression. PACKAGE_FILTER perhaps? * Looks like an extra space on line 346. * Missing space on 75

RFR: JDK-8168772 Convert javadoc generation to build-infra standards

2016-10-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
The Javadoc generation was never touched by the original build-infra conversion project. The Javadoc.gmk file is still a mess of duplicated code and ill-defined responsibilities. For any kind of improvements to be able to happen in the Javadoc area, the old codebase needs to be cleaned up and