Right, explainable differences are fine of course. Thanks for the report!
/Erik
On 2018-03-13 03:27, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-03-12 21:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good given that the comparison is clean (for the affected libs).
That depends on what you mean as "clean". Of course
On 2018-03-12 21:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good given that the comparison is clean (for the affected libs).
That depends on what you mean as "clean". Of course there is a
difference in deps for libsaproc.so on solaris, since we add a new
library to link with. As a side effect, the disass
Looks good given that the comparison is clean (for the affected libs).
/Erik
On 2018-03-12 13:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
We have a few libraries that, for one reason or another, use
non-standard LDFLAGS. There is typically no good reason for this, just
historical accidents.
This patch fi
We have a few libraries that, for one reason or another, use
non-standard LDFLAGS. There is typically no good reason for this, just
historical accidents.
This patch fixes several places to remove odd or unneeded LDFLAGS, and
to make them conform better to the prevailing standard. This will
fa
