I presume build folk are aware that older compilers produce more portable
binaries.
My own rule of thumb is to use 5 year old compilers - battle tested, well
aged, but haven't turned to vinegar yet.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
> This patch
On 2018-04-04 17:05, David Holmes wrote:
On 4/04/2018 4:14 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
This patch changes the default devkit used to produce builds for
Linux x64 at Oracle. The new devkit is based on GCC 7.3.0.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8200375/webrev.01/
What does the final
On 4/04/2018 4:14 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
This patch changes the default devkit used to produce builds for Linux
x64 at Oracle. The new devkit is based on GCC 7.3.0.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8200375/webrev.01/
What does the final part of gcc7.3.0-OEL6.4+1.0 refer to? It was
Erik:
On 04/03/18 12:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-03 20:14, Erik Joelsson wrote:
This patch changes the default devkit used to produce builds for Linux
x64 at Oracle. The new devkit is based on GCC 7.3.0.
Woho! :) The future is here. What a leap, 4.9.2 -> 7.3.0.
Indeed.
On 2018-04-03 20:14, Erik Joelsson wrote:
This patch changes the default devkit used to produce builds for Linux
x64 at Oracle. The new devkit is based on GCC 7.3.0.
Woho! :) The future is here. What a leap, 4.9.2 -> 7.3.0.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8200375/webrev.01/
Looks
This patch changes the default devkit used to produce builds for Linux
x64 at Oracle. The new devkit is based on GCC 7.3.0.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8200375/webrev.01/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200375
/Erik