On 10 Apr 2014, at 20:03, Mike Duigou wrote:
> Looks good to me and useful. (Other than that I had hoped to claim "-s" for
> a future change I planned ;-) (no worries, I will use "-r" for that))
Thanks for the review Mike. If you want to keep ‘-s’ we can come up with
something else, “—np|—no
Looks good to me and useful. (Other than that I had hoped to claim "-s" for a
future change I planned ;-) (no worries, I will use "-r" for that))
Mike
On Apr 10 2014, at 08:54 , Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Sometimes I get a little confused/nervous when trying to push/status/in using
> the hgfores
Sometimes I get a little confused/nervous when trying to push/status/in using
the hgforest.sh script. The output can be a little confusing as it runs several
jobs in parallel.
I would like to add an option to support sequential operation of commands. It
is off by default. The more nervous of us