> On Dec 8, 2017, at 10:45 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> OK, I've opened the RFR "JDK-8193255: Root Certificates should be
> stored in text format and assembled at build time" for this issue.
In fact, I would recommend we directly release cacerts as a text file
containing PEM certificates, fo
On 12/8/17 8:15 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
OK, I've opened the RFR "JDK-8193255: Root Certificates should be
stored in text format and assembled at build time" for this issue.
I've also put some information about how the AdoptOpenJDK builds their
cacerts JKS file from the Mozilla certdata.txt dat
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
>
> On 2017-12-05 18:33, Sean Mullan wrote:
>>
>> On 12/5/17 12:01 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rajan,
>>>
>>> 'cacerts' is a binary file and I thought we have at least the
>>> convention in the OpenJDK project that we don't want to
On 2017-12-05 18:33, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 12/5/17 12:01 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
'cacerts' is a binary file and I thought we have at least the
convention in the OpenJDK project that we don't want to check in
binary artefact's if possible.
One problem with 'cacerts' being a binary
On 12/5/17 12:01 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
'cacerts' is a binary file and I thought we have at least the
convention in the OpenJDK project that we don't want to check in
binary artefact's if possible.
One problem with 'cacerts' being a binary file is that we can not add
a license and
Hi Rajan,
'cacerts' is a binary file and I thought we have at least the
convention in the OpenJDK project that we don't want to check in
binary artefact's if possible.
One problem with 'cacerts' being a binary file is that we can not add
a license and copyright to it. Another one is that it is ha
On 05.12.2017 10:08, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I think the folks from the AdoptOpenJDK project are using this option
(CC-ed adoption-discuss). I'm not sure if they want to drop their root
certificates in favor of the new ones.
Maybe they can upstream their root certs as well, if it seems prude
On 2017-12-05 10:25, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
On 2017-12-05 09:44, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
On 2017-12-01 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
great to see this finally happen!
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> On 2017-12-05 09:44, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2017-12-01 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
great to see this finally happen!
I
On 2017-12-05 09:44, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
On 2017-12-01 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
great to see this finally happen!
I have just a quick question related to the tests. As far as I can
see, the tests will only succeed if t
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rajan,
>>
>> great to see this finally happen!
>>
>> I have just a quick question related to the tests. As far as I can
>> see, the tests will only succeed if the OpenJDK will be build w
On 2017-12-01 18:16, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi Rajan,
great to see this finally happen!
I have just a quick question related to the tests. As far as I can
see, the tests will only succeed if the OpenJDK will be build with the
new open sourced, Oracle root certificates. But what if somebody is
bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
