Thanks David.
John, your collected changes for adding all of these VAR_CPU*
definitions look ok to me.
/Erik
On 2017-08-16 21:45, David Holmes wrote:
Okay I have filed:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186313
to cover the addition of alpha, mips*, m68k and sh* platforms.
Build f
Okay I have filed:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186313
to cover the addition of alpha, mips*, m68k and sh* platforms.
Build folk still need to approve.
Thanks,
David
PS. I'll respond on each thread for completeness.
On 16/08/2017 11:45 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 08
On 08/16/2017 03:37 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
Zero itself is not exactly well maintained, and maybe accepting these
trivial patches causes Debian developers to adopt Zero more. This would
be a good thing.
Yes, this is basically my main intention. Upstreaming all these tiny patches
means that they
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 3:07 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 08/16/2017 06:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>
>> What are you proposing for Alpha and all these other platforms?
>>
>
> They work fine with the Zero port and we have been using Zero on
> the
Hi!
On 08/16/2017 06:43 AM, David Holmes wrote:
What are you proposing for Alpha and all these other platforms?
They work fine with the Zero port and we have been using Zero on
these Debian for several years now. For most architectures, just
adding the autoconf definitions is enough to get the
Hi Adrian,
On 16/08/2017 11:08 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
The attached patch adds alpha as a detected platform to platform.m4
in the same manner s390(x) was added in revision 786.
S390 support came in as a complete port of the OpenJDK:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/s390x-por
