Hi Magnus!
On 09/04/2017 03:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Here's a (not very elegant) patch that includes this file when compiling zero
on sparc:
Thanks for the patch. I was looking for something like that.
I think it solves your immediate problem. I would be (reluctantly) willing to
ac
Here's a (not very elegant) patch that includes this file when compiling
zero on sparc:
diff --git a/make/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk b/make/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk
--- a/make/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk
+++ b/make/lib/JvmFeatures.gmk
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@
ifeq ($(call check-jvm-feature, zero), true)
JVM_CFLAGS_FEA
Hi Magnus,
On 30/08/2017 11:25 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-08-30 15:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-08-30 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I am currently working on fixing JDK-8186578:
Zero fails to build on linux-sparc due to sparc-specific code
One necessary
On 08/30/2017 03:25 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Would it be painful to duplicate the function in cpu/zero? I realize this
is not elegant, but we don't have a good story for sharing platform-specific
functionality with zero. :(
But then we could also just move it into src/share/vm/gc/shared/,
On 08/30/2017 03:22 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
I'm sure it's *possible*. I'm also fairly certain it will be messy. :)
I already guess that.
Unfortunately, the usage of various defines in presence of zero seems
not very well defined. That is, should SPARC be defined alongside ZERO,
or shoul
On 2017-08-30 15:22, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-08-30 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I am currently working on fixing JDK-8186578:
Zero fails to build on linux-sparc due to sparc-specific code
One necessary change to be able to fix this bug is to build the
SPARC-specifi
On 2017-08-30 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi!
I am currently working on fixing JDK-8186578:
Zero fails to build on linux-sparc due to sparc-specific code
One necessary change to be able to fix this bug is to build the
SPARC-specific source memset_with_concurrent_readers_sparc.cp
