P.S. Forgot to mention, this looks good to me. Thanks for jumping in
on this one. ;)
Brad
On 1/9/2014 12:07 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I have a change that needs a review to the manifest.mf file for the
Specification-Version from 1.8 to 1.9. This is needed as part of the
build & si
On 1/9/2014 12:34 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/01/2014 08:07, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
As an aside, I think we should strike while the iron is hot and get the
changes required to move major versions written down somewhere (maybe
checked into the forest). I see Joe has updated the JDK_MINOR_V
2014/1/8 16:47 -0800, erik.joels...@oracle.com:
> ...
>
> For the future, is there a reason for not automatically generating the
> "specification-version" based on the version numbers we have, or at
> least move the definition of it to the version numbers file?
Excellent question. We should tr
On 2014-01-09 09:34, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 09/01/2014 08:07, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I have a change that needs a review to the manifest.mf file for the
Specification-Version from 1.8 to 1.9. This is needed as part of the
build & signing of crypto signed jar files. Being from the secur
On 09/01/2014 08:07, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I have a change that needs a review to the manifest.mf file for the
Specification-Version from 1.8 to 1.9. This is needed as part of the
build & signing of crypto signed jar files. Being from the security
side and not the build side of the op
