On 22/03/2012 12:30 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
That would be this:
Changeset: fb3a2cafc230
Author: andrew
Date: 2012-03-08 14:04 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/fb3a2cafc230
Thanks Dan! I see it came in through the build repo which is why I
couldn't find it. Now I
That would be this:
Changeset: fb3a2cafc230
Author:andrew
Date: 2012-03-08 14:04 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/fb3a2cafc230
7150392: Linux build breaks with GCC 4.7 due to unrecognized option
Summary: Remove -mimpure-text option.
Reviewed-by: ohair, dholm
Did this get pushed somewhere?
David
On 3/03/2012 1:11 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-02 10:09]:
- Original Message -
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
- Original Message -
* Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
The sample.makefile.txt files may not even
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-08 09:06]:
> - Original Message -
> > * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-02 10:09]:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > > > > > The sampl
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-02 10:09]:
> > - Original Message -
> > > * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > > > > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during
>
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-02 10:09]:
> - Original Message -
> > * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > > > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > > > > build, I'm not sure.
> > > >
- Original Message -
> * Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> > - Original Message -
> > > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > > > build, I'm not sure.
> > > > They may have only been supplied as documentation
BugId: 7150392 Linux build breaks with GCC 4.7 due to unrecognized option
David
-
On 2/03/2012 7:14 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
- Original Message -
* Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
* Andrew Hughes [2012-03-01 15:40]:
> - Original Message -
> > * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > > build, I'm not sure.
> > > They may have only been supplied as documentation on how to build
> > > the native code.
>
- Original Message -
> * Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> > The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the
> > build, I'm not sure.
> > They may have only been supplied as documentation on how to build
> > the native code.
> >
> > Deleting the -mimpure-text is probably ri
* Kelly O'Hair [2012-02-29 20:39]:
> The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the build, I'm not
> sure.
> They may have only been supplied as documentation on how to build the native
> code.
>
> Deleting the -mimpure-text is probably right all around.
>
Okay, so then looks l
The sample.makefile.txt files may not even be used during the build, I'm not
sure.
They may have only been supplied as documentation on how to build the native
code.
Deleting the -mimpure-text is probably right all around.
-kto
On Feb 29, 2012, at 4:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * David Holmes
* David Holmes [2012-02-29 18:48]:
> Sorry let me back up a step here. The issue with linux-sparc
> involved the actual build instructions in Compiler-gcc.gmk, not so
> much the sample makefiles for the various JVMTI demos - at least in
> my response. Unless someone from serviceability indicates o
* David Holmes [2012-02-29 18:49]:
> On 1/03/2012 9:43 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* David Holmes [2012-02-29 18:29]:
> >>>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbhole/GCC-4.7-JDK8.01/
> >>
> >>Where is ARCH_FAMILY being set?
> >>
> >
> >It is set in make/common/shared/Platform.gmk
>
> But that has no conn
On 1/03/2012 9:43 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [2012-02-29 18:29]:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dbhole/GCC-4.7-JDK8.01/
Where is ARCH_FAMILY being set?
It is set in make/common/shared/Platform.gmk
But that has no connection to the sample Makefiles.
David
Deepak
David
If
Sorry let me back up a step here. The issue with linux-sparc involved
the actual build instructions in Compiler-gcc.gmk, not so much the
sample makefiles for the various JVMTI demos - at least in my response.
Unless someone from serviceability indicates otherwise I'd suggest just
deleting -mimp
* David Holmes [2012-02-29 18:29]:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> On 1/03/2012 6:30 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* David Holmes [2012-01-30 21:50]:
> >>On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>>* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
> >>
Hi Deepak,
On 1/03/2012 6:30 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 21:50]:
On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 21:50]:
> On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> >>While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
> >>deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right thing to
> >>do.
> >>
> >
> >I thought about t
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 21:50]:
> On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> >>While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
> >>deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right thing to
> >>do.
> >>
> >
> >I thought about t
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> The primary change here is a build change so I've cc'ed build-dev.
>
> The majority of the changes are to JVMTI demo files hence I've cc'd
> serviceability-dev.
>
> I think JDK8-dev doesn't need to be included now so I've bcc'd it.
>
> While
On, and it's not supported by Oracle, of course. One of the Linux
distro companies might be interested though.
On 2/1/12 7:12 AM, Paul Hohensee wrote:
linux-sparc used to build and run fine (I did the port way back when),
so it should be relatively easy to resurrect. The original port was on
a
linux-sparc used to build and run fine (I did the port way back when),
so it should be relatively easy to resurrect. The original port was on
a T1.
Paul
On 1/31/12 10:23 AM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 21:50]:
On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [
- Original Message -
> On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
> >> While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
> >> deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right thing
> >> to
> >> do.
> >>
> >
> > I thought ab
On 31/01/2012 12:36 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* David Holmes [2012-01-30 19:57]:
While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that simply
deleting the sparc-only option unconditionally is the right thing to
do.
I thought about that too. But I was unable to find info on OpenJDK +
SPARC +
This change looks fine to me.
It would be ok with me for this change to be pushed into the jdk8/build forest.
Once there, I can do a JPRT run to verify it, but I really don't seen any issue
here.
-kto
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:57 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Deepak,
>
> The primary change here is
Hi Deepak,
The primary change here is a build change so I've cc'ed build-dev.
The majority of the changes are to JVMTI demo files hence I've cc'd
serviceability-dev.
I think JDK8-dev doesn't need to be included now so I've bcc'd it.
While gcc compilation on sparc is rare I'm not sure that si
27 matches
Mail list logo
