+1
-phil.
On 11/27/18 8:45 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks ok to me.
/Erik
On 2018-11-27 05:52, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following trivial change which
handles the absence of Xrandr more generically:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8214
Looks ok to me.
/Erik
On 2018-11-27 05:52, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
can I please have a review for the following trivial change which
handles the absence of Xrandr more generically:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2018/8214343/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214343
Ch
Looks good Volker. I agree, NO_XRANDR is reasonable and better than HAVE_XRANDR.
I have to say, the amount of work this took is insane for the size of
the problem involved.
Cheers, Thomas
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:54 PM Volker Simonis wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> can I please have a review for the follow
