On 2017-05-22 09:33, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
That works for me.
The drawback is that run-test already has a big set of automatic
suffixes for different tests to run. By using a prefix, those are more
easily separated during tab completion.
I agree, prefix is better. Go with your origin
Hello,
That works for me.
The drawback is that run-test already has a big set of automatic
suffixes for different tests to run. By using a prefix, those are more
easily separated during tab completion. On the other hand, this
suggestion makes it very clear what is being asked for, which is go
"exploded" as an adjective applies well enough to "image" but not to the
imperative "run-test".
At the risk of a long name, can you move exploded to the end, with
something like
run-test-exploded-image
-- Jon
On 05/19/2017 08:36 AM, Robbin Ehn wrote:
Hi,
On 05/19/2017 12:55 PM, Erik Jo
Hi,
On 05/19/2017 12:55 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Sure we can pause this. Robbin has a local patch to play with for now.
Yes, no rush for me.
If you want another name, then we should also rename exploded-image. As I understand it, the name exploded is well established. It refers to the java
Sure we can pause this. Robbin has a local patch to play with for now.
If you want another name, then we should also rename exploded-image. As
I understand it, the name exploded is well established. It refers to the
java class files/resources not being in jars/jimage format, but exploded
as se
I like the idea, the changes in itself look good, but I really *really*
do not like the name "exploded". It was not good before as in
"exploded-image", but this is even worse. :-(
Can we pause this one for just a while and try really hard to come up
with a better name? If we fail to do that in
Thank you Erik for doing this!
/Robbin
On 05/19/2017 11:26 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
In most cases, when running regression tests, you want to run them on the jdk image because that's the correct image and some tests will not work on other variants.
However, many tests can be run successfully on