This patch won't work for me. I use the following "workaround" patch
instead:
diff -r 8a2bc6e82d81 make/java/Makefile
--- a/make/java/Makefile
+++ b/make/java/Makefile
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
endif # PLATFORM
ifeq ($(PLATFORM), macosx)
- SUBDIRS += jobjc
+# SUBDIRS += jobjc
endif # PLATFORM
i
I would expect the necessary classes to be in
build/$PLATFORM-$ARCH/classes, so you might want to try using that path
instead of the proposed condition.
-- Jon
On 08/15/2012 11:30 AM, Joel Borggrén-Franck wrote:
Well that didn't work, patch inline:
diff -r 38263aa28324 src/macosx/native/jo
Ive filed a bug: 7191703 for this.
Kumar
I would't say I'm working on it.
But from the department of "works for me (^(TM))" here is a patch that sort of
works for me. It might be breaking other stuff (like full forest builds), and it might
not be what we want to do ...
cheers
/Joel
On 1
Well that didn't work, patch inline:
diff -r 38263aa28324 src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml
--- a/src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml Mon Jul 30 22:32:59 2012 +0100
+++ b/src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml Wed Aug 15 20:09:08 2012 +0200
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@
+
+
+
+
@@ -115
I would't say I'm working on it.
But from the department of "works for me (™)" here is a patch that sort of
works for me. It might be breaking other stuff (like full forest builds), and
it might not be what we want to do ...
cheers
/Joel
On 10 aug 2012, at 07:39, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> It
On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> It does and I believe Joel, in the langtools team, is looking at this
>> issue.
>>
>> /Erik
>>
>> On 2012-08-10 03:00, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built
>>>
- Original Message -
> It does and I believe Joel, in the langtools team, is looking at this
> issue.
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2012-08-10 03:00, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> > I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built
> > with the bootjdk javac is the langtools
> > bootstrap javac
Yes, that's what should be happening as I understand it. But right now,
it's always the bootjdk. I also believe it's hardcoded to src and target
1.5.
/Erik
On 2012-08-10 14:17, Andrew Hughes wrote:
- Original Message -
It does and I believe Joel, in the langtools team, is looking at
It does and I believe Joel, in the langtools team, is looking at this issue.
/Erik
On 2012-08-10 03:00, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built with the
bootjdk javac is the langtools
bootstrap javac.jar, all other javac compilations needs to be don
I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built with the
bootjdk javac is the langtools
bootstrap javac.jar, all other javac compilations needs to be done by the
bootstrap javac.
Does that fix this issue?
-kto
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The classpath re
The classpath reference was added on my request for build-infra. The
reason was to get javax.annotation.GenerateNativeHeader on the
classpath. The javac used in that ant script is the bootjdk javac, which
usually doesn't provide the annotation. I suppose the correct fix would
be to change the a
On 7/25/2012 2:23 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Naoto has noticed this build failure on the Mac (just the Mac) when building
just the jdk repository.
From what I can tell, the Mac build of the jdk repository now depends on the
langtools repository also
being built, which means that partial builds o
12 matches
Mail list logo
