On May 11, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On 05/11/11 10:50, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> On May 11, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Q2: Does it belong somewhere other than the bin directory?
>>> The script can be used to tunnel RMI calls over HTTP. Probably legacy now
>>>
On 05/11/2011 09:50 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Please review this change:
7043921: generate java-rmi.cgi on 64 bit platform
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/java-rmi-7043921/webrev/
I think this works for you guys, and seems to be a bit more obvious, at least
to me. ;^)
If, as the o
On May 11, 2011, at 6:59 PM, David Katleman wrote:
>
>
> On 5/11/2011 6:50 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> Please review this change:
>>
>> 7043921: generate java-rmi.cgi on 64 bit platform
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/java-rmi-7043921/webrev/
>>
>> I think this works for you guys
On 5/11/2011 6:50 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Please review this change:
7043921: generate java-rmi.cgi on 64 bit platform
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/java-rmi-7043921/webrev/
I think this works for you guys, and seems to be a bit more obvious, at least
to me. ;^)
Was this revie
Please review this change:
7043921: generate java-rmi.cgi on 64 bit platform
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/java-rmi-7043921/webrev/
I think this works for you guys, and seems to be a bit more obvious, at least
to me. ;^)
-kto
On May 11, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> Also, given that you have written up a more correct patch, perhaps you should
> be committing it instead?
Let me take care of this. I'll send out a webrev shortly.
-kto
On 21:09 Wed 11 May , Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
> Omair,
>
> CR 7043921 . It need someone from jdk team to integrate it.
>
Omair has commit rights so he can just push it now.
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU
On 05/11/2011 01:49 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
Q2: Does it belong somewhere other than the bin directory?
I am not sure. It is not supposed to be executed directly by a
user. But it is an executable file. I think the extension makes it
clear th
On 05/11/11 10:50, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
Q2: Does it belong somewhere other than the bin directory?
The script can be used to tunnel RMI calls over HTTP. Probably legacy
now and I'm pretty sure that java-rmi.cgi is just meant to be an
examp
On May 11, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> Q2: Does it belong somewhere other than the bin directory?
>>
>>
> The script can be used to tunnel RMI calls over HTTP. Probably legacy now and
> I'm pretty sure that java-rmi.cgi is just meant to be an example script. The
> RMI FAQ p
On May 11, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
>>
>> Q2: Does it belong somewhere other than the bin directory?
>>
>
> I am not sure. It is not supposed to be executed directly by a user. But it
> is an executable file. I think the extension makes it clear that only a HTTP
> server is supp
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I found this bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4495986
Which seems to imply that maybe this java-rmi.cgi file doesn't belong in the
"bin" directory at all?
But it also seems to me that the current:
91 ifneq ($(ARCH_DATA_MODEL), 32)
92 build: stubs
93 else
On 05/11/2011 01:03 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I found this bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4495986
Which seems to imply that maybe this java-rmi.cgi file doesn't belong in the
"bin" directory at all?
But it also seems to me that the current:
91 ifneq ($(ARCH_DATA_MODEL), 32)
Omair,
CR 7043921 . It need someone from jdk team to integrate it.
-Dmitry
On 2011-05-11 20:17, Omair Majid wrote:
On 05/09/2011 04:02 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Omair,
Will do it tomorrow.
Ping. Just in case you forgot.
Thanks,
Omair
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Java Hotspot development tea
I found this bug:
http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=4495986
Which seems to imply that maybe this java-rmi.cgi file doesn't belong in the
"bin" directory at all?
But it also seems to me that the current:
91 ifneq ($(ARCH_DATA_MODEL), 32)
92 build: stubs
93 else # ARCH_DATA_MODEL
9
On 05/09/2011 04:02 PM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Omair,
Will do it tomorrow.
Ping. Just in case you forgot.
Thanks,
Omair
On 17:32 Tue 10 May , Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> I'm a little reluctant to accept this, I'm not sure what the full
> ramifications are.
> But I think we want it.
>
> Is this in OpenJDK6 now?
>
OpenJDK6 changes have to go through 7 first, so no. But it's been in IcedTea6
since
before there w
I'm a little reluctant to accept this, I'm not sure what the full ramifications
are.
But I think we want it.
Is this in OpenJDK6 now?
-kto
On May 6, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone kindly review the patch at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/rmi-cgi-b
Omair,
Will do it tomorrow.
-Dmitry
On 2011-05-09 18:07, Omair Majid wrote:
On 05/09/2011 02:17 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Omair,
Looks good for me.
Great! May I have a bug id, please?
Thanks,
Omair
-Dmitry
On 2011-05-07 00:49, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Could someone kindly review the
On 05/09/2011 02:17 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Omair,
Looks good for me.
Great! May I have a bug id, please?
Thanks,
Omair
-Dmitry
On 2011-05-07 00:49, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Could someone kindly review the patch at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/rmi-cgi-bin/01/
The patch
Omair,
Looks good for me.
-Dmitry
On 2011-05-07 00:49, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Could someone kindly review the patch at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/rmi-cgi-bin/01/
The patch causes the shell script java-rmi.cgi to be built regardless of
the arch (32/64 bit) on all non-windows
Hi,
Could someone kindly review the patch at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/rmi-cgi-bin/01/
The patch causes the shell script java-rmi.cgi to be built regardless of
the arch (32/64 bit) on all non-windows platforms. I don't see anything
in that script that requires a 32-bit platfo
22 matches
Mail list logo
