We can also run lint on solaris.
Thanks,
Dmitri
Peter B. Kessler wrote:
If you've figured out where to run such a checker, can we run
pscan on our native sources? Last time I checked, it took 3
seconds to run on a local copy of HotSpot (and found some things
that I fixed). I did try
> If we did publish those
> results I'd want to tie it to an effort to find community members to reduce
> the number of findbugs warnings.
I for one would be happy to contribute to that.
Cheers,
Lars
It's possible that it got folded into -Wformat on recent gcc's.
That's fine for the platforms (and bits of source) we compile
with gcc, but it would be nice if we could check all our code.
... peter
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Jeez, I can't even spell running right... :^{
The p
It looks like you want the -auxclasspath flag to findbugs.
See http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/manual/ch11.html
(I haven't actually tried this myself)
Martin
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm currently looking at how we could possible include a run
Kelly,
There are two ways to use findbugs. It would be good to have a batch
run of findbugs per build with the goal of publishing metrics.
Separately, developers should be encouraged to run findbugs however
works best for them, to get their findbug count down.
-- Jon
On May 13, 2008,
David Herron wrote:
As the Quality group lead - I would be happy to have more quality
metrics like findbugs results to publish on the site. If we did publish
those results I'd want to tie it to an effort to find community members
to reduce the number of findbugs warnings. And, um, it would
Jeez, I can't even spell running right... :^{
The pscan site seems to be dead:
http://www.striker.ottawa.on.ca/~aland/pscan/
Anybody know what the new public site is for pscan?
---
As to when to run findbugs, my conclusion is that the only time you
can run it is after the entire jdk is built,
As the Quality group lead - I would be happy to have more quality
metrics like findbugs results to publish on the site. If we did publish
those results I'd want to tie it to an effort to find community members
to reduce the number of findbugs warnings. And, um, it would be nice to
have a para
I agree that having results of findbugs (and other checkers) as one of
the results of the build would be a good idea.
-Joe
Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
Since it takes so long time, how about the release engineer running it
once after every build and post the result to openjdk.java.net? Hope
some
If you've figured out where to run such a checker, can we run
pscan on our native sources? Last time I checked, it took 3
seconds to run on a local copy of HotSpot (and found some things
that I fixed). I did try it on all the native code in the JDK,
but I forget how long it took. It wasn't long
Since it takes so long time, how about the release engineer running
it once after every build and post the result to openjdk.java.net?
Hope some people would read it and send us fixes.
Max
On May 14, 2008, at 7:37 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I'm currently looking at how we could possible inclu
Kelly,
I think that running findbugs on different segments of JDK and
publishing histograms of the results on the OpenJDK Quality pages
would be a fine idea, but unless we can get engineers to sign up to
reducing bugs found by findbugs, the histograms would be somewhat
boring.
-- Jon
I'm currently looking at how we could possible include a run of findbugs
in the build process, but my conclusion right now is that we cannot do it
by default, it takes way to long to run findbugs over everything. (>12hrs).
But I could add some minor support to the Makefiles to allow someone to
r
13 matches
Mail list logo
