On 2011-12-01 18:49, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
We have at least three options:
1. #ifdef -
pro we can slowly migrate from
#ifdef OpenBSD to #ifdef HAVE_MAD_LINKER
cons it pollutes code and doesn't cover all cases.
2. Dir structure
unix/generic
Am 30.11.2011 18:16, schrieb Phil Race:
On 11/30/2011 5:15 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Dmitry Samersoff:
count me too for src/unix
+1
I more would like src/posix + src/winapi
Which would be wrong. Its not just posix. More of the code in src/solaris
is related to UI
Ulf,
The problem is that (e.g.) MacOS or OpenBSD
share some code from generic_unix and generic_bsd but has some unique
code as well.
We have to keep this logic somewhere.
We have at least three options:
1. #ifdef -
pro we can slowly migrate from
#ifdef OpenBSD to #ifdef
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 15:08 -0800, Phil Race wrote:
Flat vs Hierarchical is OK. its needless proliferation I was objecting to.
If ifdef capability can be used I have no issues with that either.
I suggested maintaining the name as src/solaris partly because I don't
believe in churn
and am
On 2011-11-30 16:05, Steve Poole wrote:
I suggested maintaining the name as src/solaris partly because I don't
believe in churn
and am not sure what would make a better name other than src/unix ..
would that be OK ?
+1 for src/unix
count me too for src/unix
+1
--
Dmitry Samersoff
Java
Am 30.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Dmitry Samersoff:
On 2011-11-30 16:05, Steve Poole wrote:
I suggested maintaining the name as src/solaris partly because I don't
believe in churn
and am not sure what would make a better name other than src/unix ..
would that be OK ?
+1 for src/unix
count me too
On 11/30/2011 5:15 AM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 13:10, schrieb Dmitry Samersoff:
On 2011-11-30 16:05, Steve Poole wrote:
I suggested maintaining the name as src/solaris partly because I don't
believe in churn
and am not sure what would make a better name other than src/unix ..
would that
On 11/30/2011 09:16 AM, Phil Race wrote:
unix has a better implication of more than just posix.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix-like
The Open Group owns the UNIX trademark and administers the Single UNIX
Specification, with the UNIX name being used as a certification mark.
-- Jon
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 17:20 +0100, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
2011-11-28 16:46, Ulf Zibis skrev:
I guess you meant:
--shared
--posix
|--SYSV
||--solaris
||--aix
|
|--gnu
||--linux
||
|--BSD
--src
|--share
|--posix
|--winapi
|--SYSV
|--GNU
|--BSD
|--solaris
|--aix
|--gnu
|--linux
|--darwin
|--freebsd
|--windows
|--wince
* 95%+ of the code will be the same across solaris/linux/etc
On 29/11/2011 19:34, Phil Race wrote:
:
* 95%+ of the code will be the same across solaris/linux/etc
And remember this includes all the X11 code.
* Of the remaining 5%, most of it is best dealt with via ifdef
because its a few line delta in a large file.
I'd guess 2% of the code might
Am 27.11.2011 22:29, schrieb Mike Duigou:
Only if necessary hopefully. As we have shared and platform code we might have
shared
|--posix
||--SYSV
|||--solaris
|||--aix
||
||--gnu
|||--linux
|||
||--BSD
|
2011-11-28 16:46, Ulf Zibis skrev:
I guess you meant:
--shared
--posix
|--SYSV
||--solaris
||--aix
|
|--gnu
||--linux
||
|--BSD
|--darwin
|--freebsd
--winapi
|--win32
|--wince
Additionaly I think, 'share' should be replaced by 'common'.
'share', as a verb, seems ugly along 'posix', 'winapi' to me.
-Ulf
Am 28.11.2011 17:20, schrieb Fredrik Öhrström:
2011-11-28 16:46, Ulf Zibis skrev:
I guess you meant:
--shared
--posix
|--SYSV
||--solaris
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:39:59 +0100 Fredrik ?hrstr?m
fredrik.ohrst...@oracle.com wrote :
When we rename directories, we lose a lot of
information in the source control system.
hg moves don't cause any of the history to be lost. Some tools (including
NetBeans) follow the history through
On 28/11/2011 7:29 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:39:59 +0100 Fredrik
?hrstr?mfredrik.ohrst...@oracle.com wrote :
When we rename directories, we lose a lot of
information in the source control system.
hg moves don't cause any of the history to be lost. Some tools
On 24/11/2011 14:39, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
:
It would be great to do the rename. However, we should not do that
before the build-infra changes
are in place. The peculiarities of the current build have already been
worked around and the new
makefiles are useful, since it is easy to see where
Off topic.
I don't have any suggestion on src and make at the moment but is it good
to build platform-specific binaries into different directories and keep
the common files at a single place? If so we can create a single merged
image that is executable everywhere.
-Max
On 11/25/2011 06:59
On 23/11/2011 20:48, David Holmes wrote:
Alan,
It's definitely tricky (lots of refactoring needed) but it definitely
needs to be done at some point - however I think we already missed the
opportunity to do this before integrating the BSD and MacOSX code
(same on the VM side)
I've often
2011-11-24 11:11, Alan Bateman skrev:
The immediate benefit of renaming is that it would allow us to move the
Solaris and Linux specific source files out of the src/unix tree into
src/platform directories. That would eliminate the need for some of
the filtering in the build and would also
On 25/11/2011 12:39 AM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
No-one answered my question if we need to track the posix pedigree? I.e.
gnu, sysv and bsd?
I would hope this would not be necessary. There would have to be a
critical mass of duplicated code (say between Solaris and BSD) to
warrant a further
2011-11-23 13:12, Alan Bateman skrev:
In the jdk repository then src/solaris has all the Solaris and Linux
code. Most of it is used for both platforms with a small number of files
specific to one or the other. I'm sure this has come up before (probably
many times) but I'd like to bring it
Alan,
I'd thought about it couple of times (actually, every time i touched
networking code)
Unfortunately there is no simple solution because lots of code has huge
common part and small platform specific function on top of it.
Also with a course to expand platform coverage it's possible to end
At the risk of including Yet Another alias, you should include
build-infra-...@openjdk.java.net, for the team working on the new build
system.
-- Jon
On 11/23/2011 06:40 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Alan,
I'd thought about it couple of times (actually, every time i touched
networking code)
Its tricky.
I would not gratuitously change any of the directory names, especially
the win32 one.
There'd have to be a compelling reason.
The Linux and Solaris ports share X11 for their windowing system, but
the OS X port
doesn't. So some mac things would go in src/solaris, as they are
Alan,
It's definitely tricky (lots of refactoring needed) but it definitely
needs to be done at some point - however I think we already missed the
opportunity to do this before integrating the BSD and MacOSX code (same
on the VM side)
David
On 23/11/2011 10:12 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
In
26 matches
Mail list logo
