On 01/18/2018 05:51 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 19/01/2018 3:20 AM, Alan Snyder wrote:
I tried building from the jdk repo (vs jdk10). The
StringPlatformChars test passed. The other four tests appear to have
been removed.
However, I did get failures on these tests:
• MethodHandleConstant
On 19/01/2018 3:20 AM, Alan Snyder wrote:
I tried building from the jdk repo (vs jdk10). The StringPlatformChars test
passed. The other four tests appear to have been removed.
However, I did get failures on these tests:
• MethodHandleConstants (internal error: appendix)
>• MethodR
I tried building from the jdk repo (vs jdk10). The StringPlatformChars test
passed. The other four tests appear to have been removed.
However, I did get failures on these tests:
• MethodHandleConstants (internal error: appendix)
• JavadocHelperTest (out of memory — Java heap spac
Alan,
On 18/01/2018 6:52 AM, Alan Snyder wrote:
To summarize, these are the test failures/errors:
• StringPlatformChars (error — native code not found)
This seems potentially a makefile issue.
• NewUnsafeString (did not use provided string)
• APIExtraction (class fil
To summarize, these are the test failures/errors:
• StringPlatformChars (error — native code not found)
• NewUnsafeString (did not use provided string)
• APIExtraction (class file for TestClass not found)
• ClassDependenciesTest (assertion error — null pointer in lo
I started from scratch using the sledgehammer approach and got the same results.
> On Jan 17, 2018, at 4:16 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
> wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-16 17:28, Alan Snyder wrote:
>> Is there some resolution to this?
>>
>> Is the JDK that I built valid despite the test failures?
>>
>
Regarding your last point, it seems that the test image has been built, so
perhaps the problem lies elsewhere.
Alans-iMac:jdk10 alan$ ll build/*/images
total 3344
drwxr-xr-x 81 alan staff 2754 Jan 5 10:41 gengraphs
drwxr-xr-x 11 alan staff 374 Jan 5 10:42 jdk
drwxr-xr-x 3 alan s
On 2018-01-16 17:28, Alan Snyder wrote:
Is there some resolution to this?
Is the JDK that I built valid despite the test failures?
Are there problems with some tests or with the test scripts? If so, will the
problems be fixed?
I believe the problem is most likely to reside in your environme
Is there some resolution to this?
Is the JDK that I built valid despite the test failures?
Are there problems with some tests or with the test scripts? If so, will the
problems be fixed?
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 9:39 AM, Alan Snyder wrote:
>
> I already tried make test-image; make run-test-tier1
I already tried make test-image; make run-test-tier1 and it had no impact on
the outcome. Given that, do you still want me to try your suggestion?
Alan
> On Jan 8, 2018, at 11:28 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
> wrote:
>
>
>> 8 jan. 2018 kl. 23:23 skrev David Holmes :
>>
>>> On 9/01/2018 4:35 AM
> 8 jan. 2018 kl. 23:23 skrev David Holmes :
>
>> On 9/01/2018 4:35 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Maybe the Makefile targets to run tests could report an up-front warning if
>> the native libraries have not been built.
>
> Based on my observations the makefile target will also build the test-i
On 9/01/2018 4:35 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Maybe the Makefile targets to run tests could report an up-front warning
if the native libraries have not been built.
Based on my observations the makefile target will also build the
test-image if needed.
David
A more advanced solution would be
s like a problem using an older build of jtreg, from the Adopt
OpenJDK group. The tell-tale evidence is the Class-Path entry in the jtreg.jar
MANIFEST.MF file: does that entry include asmtools.jar?
T
Following the instructions for the impatient, I did make images and then make
run-test-tier1.
Then after replacing the jtreg with the one Jon recommended, I did make
run-test-tier1 again.
Alan
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 6:32 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> On 6/01/2018 12:05 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
>
he Adopt
OpenJDK group. The tell-tale evidence is the Class-Path entry in the jtreg.jar
MANIFEST.MF file: does that entry include asmtools.jar?
There have been build changes for jtreg recently, that should have addressed
this problem. If nothing else, it is now much easier to build jtreg yo
The tests were run via make.
> On Jan 5, 2018, at 4:13 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>
> Alan,
>
> Unclear how you ran the tests, but:
>
> TEST RESULT: Error. Use -nativepath to specify the location of native code
>
> indicates jtreg was not passed the -nativepath flag. That may or may not be a
>
wrote:
That sounds like a problem using an older build of jtreg, from the Adopt
OpenJDK group. The tell-tale evidence is the Class-Path entry in the jtreg.jar
MANIFEST.MF file: does that entry include asmtools.jar?
There have been build changes for jtreg recently, that should have addressed
this pro
vestigate what we can do to fix this.
-- Jon
On 01/05/2018 12:36 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
That sounds like a problem using an older build of jtreg, from the Adopt
OpenJDK group. The tell-tale evidence is the Class-Path entry in the jtreg.jar
MANIFEST.MF file: does that entry include asmtool
;>> On Jan 5, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Gibbons >>> <mailto:jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Alan,
>>>>
>>>> I confirm there are problems with the jtreg builds from the Adopt OpenJDK
>>>> group. I&#x
a problem using an older build of jtreg, from the Adopt
>>>> OpenJDK group. The tell-tale evidence is the Class-Path entry in the
>>>> jtreg.jar MANIFEST.MF file: does that entry include asmtools.jar?
>>>>
>>>> There have been build changes f
se will be downloaded,
and built if necessary.
-- Jon
On 1/5/18 12:21 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
I am trying to build jdk10 on macOS 10.12.6. I got the basic build
to work, but some tests fail.
Most of the test failures complain about not finding jasm or
jcoder. This is odd because I downloaded
recent JDK,
>> such as JDK 8. Everything else will be downloaded, and built if necessary.
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>>
>> On 1/5/18 12:21 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
>>> I am trying to build jdk10 on macOS 10.12.6. I got the basic build to work,
>>> but some
s you need are Ant
and a recent JDK, such as JDK 8. Everything else will be downloaded,
and built if necessary.
-- Jon
On 1/5/18 12:21 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
I am trying to build jdk10 on macOS 10.12.6. I got the basic build to
work, but some tests fail.
Most of the test failures complain abou
problem. If nothing else, it is now much easier to build
jtreg yourself. The only external components you need are Ant and a
recent JDK, such as JDK 8. Everything else will be downloaded, and built
if necessary.
-- Jon
On 1/5/18 12:21 PM, Alan Snyder wrote:
I am trying to build jdk10 on macOS
I am trying to build jdk10 on macOS 10.12.6. I got the basic build to work, but
some tests fail.
Most of the test failures complain about not finding jasm or jcoder. This is
odd because I downloaded jtreg-4.2-b11, which includes these classes, and the
classpath appears to be correct in the log
25 matches
Mail list logo
