Re: Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927

2009-11-07 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Kelly O'Hair wrote: Tim, I was going to push these test changes into the jdk7/build forest, but maybe it makes more sense to push it into the jdk7/tl forest? Any opinions on that? Fresh webrev: 6888927: Fix jdk jtreg tests to indicate which ones need othervm, allow for use of samevm option

Re: Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927

2009-11-07 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/11/6 Jonathan Gibbons : > Kelly O'Hair wrote: >>> >>> I like this idea, the time to run a jdk jtreg test has put me off in the >>> past. >>> BTW, jtreg is the one thing I wouldn't mind having in the tree as it's >>> not something people are likely to have installed.  IcedTea has a cut >>> down

sh files in ProblemList (was Re: Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927)

2009-11-07 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
Hi Kelly I'm looking at the ProblemList.txt file, which contains some .sh files in my area. I guess the .sh files should behave the same no matter if - savevm is turned on, since it's always launched in another process. Am I right? These tests (except one) normally pass when I run them (ev

Re: Need reviewers - jdk testing changes 6888927

2009-11-07 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
Andrew John Hughes wrote: 2009/11/6 Jonathan Gibbons : Kelly O'Hair wrote: I like this idea, the time to run a jdk jtreg test has put me off in the past. BTW, jtreg is the one thing I wouldn't mind having in the tree as it's not something people are likely to have installed. IcedTea ha