Re: Need reviewer - minor top level make changes

2009-12-21 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair : > > Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes. > > 6727046: Add message when docs are skipped in control build > 6864011: typo? in top level Makefile: DAYE_STAMP > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ohair/openjdk7/top-make-fixes/webrev/ > > -kto > > This is a

Re: No rule to make foo.cpp needed by foo.o ???

2009-12-21 Thread David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
Well I fixed the time problem but that didn't fix the problem. I just updated three files and had to try the build three times before it worked - each time it reported needing to make one of the updated files. Bizarre. David David Holmes - Sun Microsystems said the following on 12/21/09 17:05

Re: No rule to make foo.cpp needed by foo.o ???

2009-12-21 Thread Igor Nekrestyanov
Check the output of "gnumake -dd" looking for everything related to files in question. It will tell you why rules are not fired. -igor On 12/21/09 4:48 PM, David Holmes - Sun Microsystems wrote: Well I fixed the time problem but that didn't fix the problem. I just updated three files and had t

Re: No rule to make foo.cpp needed by foo.o ???

2009-12-21 Thread David Holmes - Sun Microsystems
Igor Nekrestyanov said the following on 12/22/09 11:45: Check the output of "gnumake -dd" looking for everything related to files in question. It will tell you why rules are not fired. Surprisingly the answer was because "Foo.cpp does not exist" which of course is nonsense. I'm guessing this

Re: No rule to make foo.cpp needed by foo.o ???

2009-12-21 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 18:42, David Holmes - Sun Microsystems wrote: > Igor Nekrestyanov said the following on 12/22/09 11:45: >> >> Check the output of "gnumake -dd" looking for everything related to files >> in question. It will tell you why rules are not fired. > > Surprisingly the answer was