In testing OpenJDK6 prior to the release of b18, one issue that has
arisen is that the version output:
openjdk version "1.6.0-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-internal-andrew_21_dec_2009_18_36-b00)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
gives no indication as to w
2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes :
> 2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair :
>>
>>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair :
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
6727046: Add message when docs are skipped in control build
6864011: typo? in top lev
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes :
2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair :
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
6727046: Add message when docs are skipped in control build
6864011: typo? in top level Makefi
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
In testing OpenJDK6 prior to the release of b18, one issue that has
arisen is that the version output:
openjdk version "1.6.0-internal"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0-internal-andrew_21_dec_2009_18_36-b00)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
I've been building the JDK for years through the Sun partner program using MKS.
Now I'm trying to build it using cygwin. I've gotten through the obvious path
errors to the point that the make starts to run. I'm getting a lot of errors,
but two in particular seem like they should be easy to di
2010/1/7 Kelly O'Hair :
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes :
>>>
>>> 2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> 2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair :
>>
>> Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
>>
>> 6727046: Ad
2010/1/7 Kelly O'Hair :
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> In testing OpenJDK6 prior to the release of b18, one issue that has
>> arisen is that the version output:
>>
>> openjdk version "1.6.0-internal"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
>> 1.6.0-internal-andrew_21_dec_2009_18_36-b00)
>> OpenJ
With OpenJDK7 b78:
>>>Recursively making docs docs @ Thu Jan 7 21:01:48 GMT 2010 ...
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/andrew/projects/openjdk/upstream/icedtea/jdk/make/docs'
rm -f -r /mnt/builder/icedtea/docs/api
/bin/mkdir -p /mnt/builder/icedtea/docs/api
/usr/lib/jvm/icedtea6/bin/java -XX:-Pr
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/7 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/12/23 Andrew John Hughes :
2009/12/23 Kelly O'Hair :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/11/19 Kelly O'Hair :
Need reviewer. Some very minor top level make file changes.
6727046: Add message when docs are skipped
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> Is it tl or build for this one?
>
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> Either one should be fine. Whatever is easier for you.
> Not sure what the tl schedule is right now.
I expect to push TL to master tomorrow afternoon (8 January) for b79.
If you don't mind waiting for b81, f
Changeset: 432cbbdc44bc
Author:andrew
Date: 2010-01-07 23:17 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/432cbbdc44bc
6914986: Make sure openjdk doc generation not turned off with JDK_UPDATE_VERSION
Summary: Only turn off documentation for updates when not building OpenJDK
2010/1/7 Tim Bell :
>
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> Is it tl or build for this one?
>>
>
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>> Either one should be fine. Whatever is easier for you.
>> Not sure what the tl schedule is right now.
>
> I expect to push TL to master tomorrow afternoon (8 January) for b79.
>
>
On both these problems I would suspect that somehow you have the
wrong "echo", and maybe it thinks it's the windows cmd echo?
So check your PATH setting and make sure that /usr/bin is
before any Windows version of echo.
-kto
Salter, Thomas A wrote:
I’ve been building the JDK for years through
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/7 Tim Bell :
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Is it tl or build for this one?
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Either one should be fine. Whatever is easier for you.
Not sure what the tl schedule is right now.
I expect to push TL to master tomorrow a
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
I have not seen this problem before. I noticed that the sourcepath is a
little strange:
-
2010/1/8 Kelly O'Hair :
>
> Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
> The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
> and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
>
> I have not seen this problem before. I noticed that the sou
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
I have not seen this problem before. I noticed that the sourcepath is a
2010/1/8 Joe Darcy :
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>> Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
>> The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
>> and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
>>
>> I have not seen this problem befor
2010/1/8 Andrew John Hughes :
> 2010/1/8 Joe Darcy :
>> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>>
>>> Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
>>> The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
>>> and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
>>>
Joe Darcy wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know
of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
I have not seen this problem before. I noticed that
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons :
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>>
>> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>>
>>> Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
>>> The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
>>> and should be built as part of the promoted build process.
>>>
>>
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons :
Joe Darcy wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
and should be built as part of the promoted
2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons :
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> 2010/1/8 Jonathan Gibbons :
>
>
> Joe Darcy wrote:
>
>
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
>
> Not many jdk developers build the docs on a regular basis that I know of.
> The docs are certainly built nightly from the master area (jdk7/jdk7),
> and sho
23 matches
Mail list logo
