2011-03-10 20:17, John Coomes skrev:
Johan Walles (johan.wal...@oracle.com) wrote:
2011-03-10 10:33, Anthony Petrov skrev:
Hi Andrew,
On 3/10/2011 3:48 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
[snip]
Hey, I'd just make it all one repository as they all interdepend on
each other
One huge "all-in-al
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I don't think that is the reason for the 1.4. But someone closer to
this SA project would need to clarify this.
The reason was so that the SA could potentially operate on an older
JDK as I recall.
I suspect 1.4 settings should have been changed to 1.5 in 1.6, and
maybe 1
On 11/03/11 01:14, David Holmes wrote:
Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/11/11 10:57:
On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
Stepping up a level, an initial download of openjdk need not involve
using mercurial at all. You can simply download a stable snapshot as a
tar file;
On 09/03/11 02:32, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
First, if we talk about the mercurial forests, it has nothing to do
with the Mercurial Forest Extension.
What we really have is a set of nested repositories, sometimes called
our "forest" of repositories.
This email is just about the actual layout of th
2011-03-10 20:17, John Coomes skrev:
Johan Walles (johan.wal...@oracle.com) wrote:
The problem for many developers with the all-in-one repository solution
is the time it takes to clone everything (5-6 minutes).
That's the best case, when I'm on the corporate network, close to the
server. Over
2011-03-11 01:57, Dr Andrew John Hughes skrev:
On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
Fredrik Öhrström said the following on 03/10/11 20:22:
I think it is important that a recent stock mercurial install
can check out the full openjdk with a single clone
command.
I.e. you should not have
2011-03-11 03:13, Erik Trimble skrev:
On 3/10/2011 5:14 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/11/11 10:57:
On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
Stepping up a level, an initial download of openjdk need not involve
using mercurial at all. You can simply down
On 03/11/2011 04:22 AM, Johan Walles wrote:
2011-03-10 20:17, John Coomes skrev:
Johan Walles (johan.wal...@oracle.com) wrote:
The problem for many developers with the all-in-one repository solution
is the time it takes to clone everything (5-6 minutes).
That's the best case, when I'm on the
I want to cast my vote for the current JDK7 layout. My effort with the source
is exclusively to port it to a proprietary OS. I tend to work off the bundled
zip files, not Hg, so I'm concerned the lines between the forests. The
advantage to me of having CORBA, JAXWS and JAXP be distinct, ident
On Mar 11, 2011, at 4:46 AM, Johan Walles wrote:
> 2011-03-11 01:57, Dr Andrew John Hughes skrev:
>> On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
>>> Fredrik Öhrström said the following on 03/10/11 20:22:
I think it is important that a recent stock mercurial install
can check out the f
On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:04 AM, Steve Poole wrote:
> On 11/03/11 01:14, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>> Dr Andrew John Hughes said the following on 03/11/11 10:57:
>>> On 06:40 Fri 11 Mar , David Holmes wrote:
Stepping up a level, an initial download of openjdk need not involve
using mer
On Mar 11, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>
>> I don't think that is the reason for the 1.4. But someone closer to this SA
>> project would need to clarify this.
>>
>> The reason was so that the SA could potentially operate on an older JDK as I
>> recall.
>> I su
It appears that there was a transient problem with the openjdk email server
earlier this week and that, as a result, some emails were not sent to the
subscriber list.
Of interest to me are two review requests:
"Review Request -- 5045147 : When TreeMap is empty explicitly check for null
keys in
13 matches
Mail list logo
