Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Request for Review: Remove import of empty JNI header files

2012-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2012-05-02 00:19, Kelly Ohair wrote: Magnus, Do you still need this integrated? I can integrate the exact same changset to awt, 2d, and build forests if you want. Yes, I still like to have this integrated. (Sorry for the slow response, it's been a bit low on the priority list.) Otherwise

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2012-04-13 16:46, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: On 04/13/2012 02:07 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: As for the --with-num-cores, yes, it is a configure time option. The underlying assumption is that your hardware doesn't really change, and if your build system is too weak, it will be too weak at

Solaris-only flag with newer gcc = build failed

2012-05-14 Thread Pierre Laporte
Hi OpenJDK people ! I tried to build the latest version of OpenJDK on my machine, but ran into a problem during the compilation. The error I got was "gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mimpure-text'". I am not a C/C++ programmer but I found out that this option is for Solaris only. It

RE: 64 bit pointers needed

2012-05-14 Thread Vitaly Mikheev
Such a radical change in the language is unlikely feasible. Maybe, resurrection of JSR-83 http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=83 implemented via compiler intrinsics would be a viable option. A motivation why it was rejected ("The proposal requires at least 82 new classes, and this seems

Re: First build-infra push to jdk8 -- try out the new build system!

2012-05-14 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On May 14, 2012, at 2:49 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > On 2012-04-13 16:46, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> On 04/13/2012 02:07 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >>> >>> As for the --with-num-cores, yes, it is a configure time option. The >>> underlying assumption is that your hardware doesn't really

Re: Solaris-only flag with newer gcc = build failed

2012-05-14 Thread David Holmes
Hi Pierre, Only just saw your email turn up on the list! This is bug 7150392 and was fixed about 6 weeks ago. From the eval: This option is causing some confusion as it was listed as a GCC sparc option and so we had concerns about its need on linux-sparc, but then it was changed to a Solaris