Fwd: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

I should probably have posted this here as well... There is a newer webrev than the one below at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/make-test-in-build-an-option/webrev.01/ This adds:  * Skip building test_gamma if TEST_IN_BUILD is not enabled  * If cross-compilin

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

Hi all, Cheers, Martijn > > >> >> >> The 2nd option would be the most up to date I guess but seems a bit >> chicken and egg.. > > I normally use the latest jdk8 binary, but as I said above, sometimes it > still fails. In this case, do a full build and save the j2sdk-image > directory somewhere

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

Martijn, there's a pretty annoying build bug around the security build area that I think you've hit. I haven't had time to look into it in detail yet. I think Max's suggestion is to *move* the top level build directory to a new name (not copy it). Basically a jdk8_tl/build/linux-amd64 and jd

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

This looks like the bug I mentioned. You should move the jdk8_tl/build/linux-amd64 directory to somewhere else. -Weijun On 05/15/2012 09:11 PM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Hi all, Cheers, Martijn The 2nd option would be the most up to date I guess but seems a bit chicken and egg.. I norm

Re: Fwd: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

I think it would be good to see a more general proposal for how to handle tests in this new world, and then to see this Queens test be a part of that design. -- Jon On 05/15/2012 04:34 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: I should probably have posted this here as well... There is a newer webrev tha

Re: Build error on jdk8/tl project - Thread.o:(.data.rel+0xbc): undefined reference to JVM_SetNativeThreadName

Hi all, Well what do poor Weijun and Sean get for posting useful instructions back in March? They get me not reading them carefully enough! Partial build now works as expected. Thanks for your patience guys, I really need to RTM more closely in future! Cheers, Martijn On 15 May 2012 15:33, Wei

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 7157855: jvisualvm.1 not included in binaries

Changeset: 8d665b69ebf1 Author:mfang Date: 2012-05-15 11:46 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/8d665b69ebf1 7157855: jvisualvm.1 not included in binaries Reviewed-by: katleman, thurka ! make/common/Release.gmk

Re: Solaris-only flag with newer gcc = build failed

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:35 AM, David Holmes wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > [...] > > This is bug 7150392 and was fixed about 6 weeks ago. > > Hi David Indeed, it's exactly the same problem as bug #7150392 I've checked several versions of OpenJDK source (jdk7/jdk7, jdk7u/jdk7u, jdk7u/jdk7u4, and jdk8/

Re: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

I agree. Builds are builds, and tests are tests. We need some separation here. -kto On May 15, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > I think it would be good to see a more general proposal for how > to handle tests in this new world, and then to see this Queens test > be a part of that de

Re: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

... but it would be able to go, eventually, "make test" :-) -- Jon On 05/15/2012 05:38 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote: I agree. Builds are builds, and tests are tests. We need some separation here. -kto On May 15, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: I think it would be good to see a more gen

Re: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

I'm not sure this will work on Windows. The make/defs.make file needs to be acceptable to NMAKE. :^( -kto On May 15, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I should probably have posted this here as well... > > There is a newer webrev than the one below at: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/

Re: Request for Review: Make the Queens test ("test in build") an option that can be disabled

I don't think there is any attempt at a "general proposal" here. This is simply providing a means to disable the existing (mis-placed perhaps) Queens test. In essence our top-level hotspot targets combine: make build_target make test_target into "make target". And if you define INSTALL then