- Original Message -
> Hi Kumar,
>
> On 07/23/2012 11:19 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
> > My suggestion is to see if System.loadLibrary can be used, this
> > will
> > bode well for the modularization effort.
>
> I discussed this with the folks at awt-dev and they would prefer to
> avoid lo
Hello Omair,
Hi Kumar,
On 07/23/2012 11:19 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
My suggestion is to see if System.loadLibrary can be used, this will
bode well for the modularization effort.
I discussed this with the folks at awt-dev and they would prefer to
avoid loading as much as possible. They are
On 08/09/2012 01:39 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>> 2. This patch uses RPATH (and not RUNPATH). This makes it impossible to
>> > use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to override the linker path. I don't see any
>> > potential dangerous effects (pretty much all libraries in the have an
>> > RPATH), and I suspect it'
On 08/09/2012 07:15 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Hi Kumar,
>>
>> On 07/23/2012 11:19 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>> My suggestion is to see if System.loadLibrary can be used, this
>>> will
>>> bode well for the modularization effort.
>>
>> I discussed this with the fo
I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built with the
bootjdk javac is the langtools
bootstrap javac.jar, all other javac compilations needs to be done by the
bootstrap javac.
Does that fix this issue?
-kto
On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:33 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> The classpath re
It does and I believe Joel, in the langtools team, is looking at this issue.
/Erik
On 2012-08-10 03:00, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I think we need to make sure that the only thing that gets built with the
bootjdk javac is the langtools
bootstrap javac.jar, all other javac compilations needs to be don
