Re: Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

2013-01-01 Thread Erik Joelsson
New webrev. I decided that David was right, it really should be in closed so I moved it there, along with the closed version numbers file and the reading of it. These files are also changing names slightly to avoid the .numbers extension which is just weird. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8

Re: Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

2013-01-01 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Looks ok. --- Is it just me, or is this m4 stuff hard to review with plain diffs. :^( One of these days someone will come up with a difference tool that takes into account the type of file it is and stop treating all files as simple text files. Has anyone ever tried http://www.guiffy.com/? -k

Re: Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

2013-01-01 Thread David Holmes
Not sure of how all the bits click together between open and closed but on the surface this looks okay. One nit. The old version number file had a copyright Copyright (c) 2012, yet somehow the new one became Copyright (c) 2011, 2012, ?? Really I think it should now be: Copyright (c) 2012,

Re: Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

2013-01-01 Thread Erik Joelsson
Fixed the copyright header of that file. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8005347/webrev.root.03/ /Erik On 2013-01-01 23:58, David Holmes wrote: Not sure of how all the bits click together between open and closed but on the surface this looks okay. One nit. The old version number file had a

Re: Review Request: 8005347: build-infra: Verify 'gnumake source' at the top level works ok

2013-01-01 Thread David Holmes
Sorry Erik I misunderstood the change that had been made. I thought common/autoconf/version-numbers was replacing common/autoconf/closed.version.numbers but it wasn't - that was the original copyright I was looking at. That means the correct copyright here would now be: Copyright (c) 2011, 20