Hello,
I built the OpenJDK from the hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt on windows 7.
Debugging java code does not show JDK method arguments with message:
"Variable information not available, source compiled without -g option"
I see the warning in the config.log file but probably it relates
I found that I did not use the --enable-debug option. I will try to
rebuild my project.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 2/13/2013 5:12 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
I built the OpenJDK from the hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt on
windows 7.
Debugging java code does not show JDK me
FYI..
I filed a bug on this, it will be fixed. Apparently builds seemed to work
without DXSDK used, so someone
incorrectly assumed that the DXSDK dependency was no longer needed. A mistake.
Getting the antique DirectX SDK is an issue of course, but
-kto
On Feb 12, 2013, at 5:09 PM, Phil Race w
On Feb 13, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> FYI..
>
> I filed a bug on this, it will be fixed. Apparently builds seemed to work
> without DXSDK used, so someone
> incorrectly assumed that the DXSDK dependency was no longer needed. A mistake.
>
> Getting the antique DirectX SDK is an iss
You are pointing at the fastdebug jdk as your boot jdk, why?
The official boot jdk for jdk8 is jdk7u7 we cannot guarantee anything else will
work, although it should,
when tracking down issues like this, you need to narrow down all the possible
differences.
I have no idea at this time what the
On 02/13/2013 04:45 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> The official boot jdk for jdk8 is jdk7u7 we cannot guarantee anything else
> will work, although it should,
Y'know, even I didn't know that. I do now. :-)
Andrew.
On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 02/13/2013 04:45 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> The official boot jdk for jdk8 is jdk7u7 we cannot guarantee anything else
>> will work, although it should,
>
> Y'know, even I didn't know that. I do now. :-)
>
> Andrew.
>
We moved to 7u7 so
The other big problem in the make IMO is that the on 64 bit Window systems
Cygwin's current version (and recent versions) hang when building Hotspot. The
only "fix" I found was installing an older version of Cygwin (1.6.9) from a
Red Hat server: ftp://ftp.ges.redhat.com/private/releng/cygwin-1
We have been successfully using CYGWIN 1.7.16 for a long time, literally on
dozens and dozens of systems, Windows XP, 2003, 2008R2, 7, x86 and x64.
I have no idea what 1.6 is.
We do not recommend CYGWIN 1.5.
So where does CYGWIN 1.6.9 come from?
-kto
On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Randy Nielsen w
Kelly, are you absolutely sure you really mean "1.7.16" and not "1.7.6"?
I think 1.7.16 is quite new so I wonder you are already using it "for
a long time".
Morover, as discussed in the previous thread
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-February/thread.html#7936),
I'm quite sur
On Feb 13, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Kelly, are you absolutely sure you really mean "1.7.16" and not "1.7.6"?
> I think 1.7.16 is quite new so I wonder you are already using it "for
> a long time".
Well, for at least 3 months, "long time" might be the wrong words, but solidly
b
Requesting approval for these changes in make/common/Release.gmk
Adding a total of 8 lines in the open makefile. The OracleJDK pages
will be placed in a closed part of the forest.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8007450/webrev.jdk.02/
The review thread is here:
http://mail.openjd
12 matches
Mail list logo
