Re: jdk8 build times

2013-08-09 Thread Erik Joelsson
I wonder if anti virus is really turned off here. In my experience, it's hard to make it stop completely. I have a slightly older laptop, same brand, that builds this in around 40-45 minutes. /Erik On 2013-08-09 03:32, Pete Brunet wrote: Haven't rebuilt a release version yet for a true compar

Re: jdk8 build times

2013-08-09 Thread Pete Brunet
My product is Norton 360. To turn it off I right click on the Norton 360 icon in the system tray and choose Disable Antivirus Auto-Protect. If anyone knows if this is not sufficient and what else needs to be done please let me know. Pete On 8/9/13 1:58 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > I wonder if an

Create a jvm.cfg for zero on 32 bit architectures

2013-08-09 Thread Omair Majid
Hi, OpenJDK fails to build with zero currently on 32 bit architectures. There's a non-architecture-specific compilation error that I fixed [1]. That makes zero build/run on 64-bit architectures. However, the build still fails on 32-bit. The error says that a jvm.cfg can not be found for zero. The

Re: jdk8 build times

2013-08-09 Thread Andreas Rieber
Hi Peter, try perfmon.exe to see where the bottleneck is. Most likely it is memory or io. If you have the option, go for a SSD drive (you will get build times ~10 minutes). Andreas On 09.08.13 16:44, Pete Brunet wrote: My product is Norton 360. To turn it off I right click on the Norton 3

Re: jdk8 build times

2013-08-09 Thread Pete Brunet
Any suggestions for SSDs? My T500 takes 2.5" SATA II. On 8/9/13 10:44 AM, Andreas Rieber wrote: > Hi Peter, > > try perfmon.exe to see where the bottleneck is. Most likely it is > memory or io. If you have the option, go for a SSD drive (you will get > build times ~10 minutes). > > Andreas > > >

Re: jdk8 build times

2013-08-09 Thread Andreas Rieber
Sorry, Peter. Can't help you there... Any SSD is better than none as long as it works in your T500 ;-) On 09.08.13 18:25, Pete Brunet wrote: Any suggestions for SSDs? My T500 takes 2.5" SATA II. On 8/9/13 10:44 AM, Andreas Rieber wrote: Hi Peter, try perfmon.exe to see where the bottleneck

Re: Warnings while building OpenJDK 8 on Linux

2013-08-09 Thread Helio Frota
Sorry for delay, Everything still ok with GCC 4.8.1 and Fedora 19 Configuration summary: * Debug level:release * JDK variant:normal * JVM variants: server * OpenJDK target: OS: linux, CPU architecture: x86, address length: 32 Tools summary: * Boot JDK: java version "1.7.0_25" Jav

Re: Assembler error on FreeBSD 9.1, toolchain problem?

2013-08-09 Thread Mike Duigou
On Aug 8 2013, at 22:57 , David Holmes wrote: > On 9/08/2013 3:31 PM, Henry Jen wrote: >> man gcc on mac, >> >>>file.s >>>Assembler code. Apple's version of GCC runs the preprocessor on >>> these files as well as those ending in .S. >>> >>>file.S >>>Ass

Re: Assembler error on FreeBSD 9.1, toolchain problem?

2013-08-09 Thread Henry Jen
On 08/09/2013 12:32 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: > > On Aug 8 2013, at 22:57 , David Holmes wrote: > >> On 9/08/2013 3:31 PM, Henry Jen wrote: >>> man gcc on mac, >>> file.s Assembler code. Apple's version of GCC runs the preprocessor on these files as well as those e

RFR: 8022734: [macosx] Rebuilding jdk 7u on mac almost always fails

2013-08-09 Thread David DeHaven
This issue has been annoying me for some time, I finally got frustrated enough to fix it. Synopsis: Running make when a build has already completed will fail when it tries to symlink libjli.dylib, then (if that's fixed by using "ln -sf") when it tries to copy the sdk image to j2sdk-server-bund

Re: Assembler error on FreeBSD 9.1, toolchain problem?

2013-08-09 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Henry, It's a known error so I closed your CR as a duplicate of existing one. -Dmitry On 2013-08-09 23:51, Henry Jen wrote: > On 08/09/2013 12:32 PM, Mike Duigou wrote: >> >> On Aug 8 2013, at 22:57 , David Holmes wrote: >> >>> On 9/08/2013 3:31 PM, Henry Jen wrote: man gcc on mac, >>

Re: Assembler error on FreeBSD 9.1, toolchain problem?

2013-08-09 Thread Henry Jen
On 08/08/2013 04:49 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: > Filed a bug: > > https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8022617 > Thanks, my search didn't show that one but the one for Mac OS which is resolved. Cheers, Henry

Re: RFR: 8022734: [macosx] Rebuilding jdk 7u on mac almost always fails

2013-08-09 Thread Leonid Romanov
This bug been driving me crazy. Thanks for fixing it! On Aug 10, 2013, at 12:14 AM, David DeHaven wrote: > > This issue has been annoying me for some time, I finally got frustrated > enough to fix it. > > Synopsis: > Running make when a build has already completed will fail when it tries to

Re: Warnings while building OpenJDK 8 on Linux

2013-08-09 Thread Konstantin Perikov
Hey, Thanks for answer. I see, that you don't build docs, what command you use to build JDK? Thanks. On Aug 9, 2013 10:26 PM, "Helio Frota" wrote: > Sorry for delay, > > Everything still ok with GCC 4.8.1 and Fedora 19 > > Configuration summary: > * Debug level:release > * JDK variant:n

Re: create.bat: command-line too long

2013-08-09 Thread Ioi Lam
|I found the (belated) answer -- you have to install VS2008 SP1.|| || I have filed JDK-8022740 for this (we need a better error message to tell user to upgrade to SP1). ||- Ioi|| || ||On 06/25/2013 11:57 AM, Ioi Lam wrote:|| | |Hi, || | | ||Has anyone seen this while executing make/windows/cre

Re: Warnings while building OpenJDK 8 on Linux

2013-08-09 Thread Helio Frota
Hello, 00:02:07 docs ? $ make DEBUG_BINARIES=true SCTP_WERROR="" all https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/Build#Fedora Thanks. 2013/8/9 Konstantin Perikov > Hey, > > Thanks for answer. > I see, that you don't build docs, what command you use to build JDK? > > Thanks. > On Aug 9, 2

RFR (XS) 8022740 - Visual 2008 IDE build is broken

2013-08-09 Thread Ioi Lam
|Please review a very small fix:|| || ||http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iklam/8022740/vs2008_ide_001/|| || ||Bug: Visual 2008 IDE build is broken|| || ||http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8022740|| ||https://jbs.oracle.com/bugs/browse/JDK-8022740|| || ||Summary of fix:|| || ||A