Re: Building JDK8 b106 with sysroot and isystem

2013-10-02 Thread David Holmes
On 30/09/2013 8:41 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2013-09-25 08:31, Jungwoo Ha wrote: So now I can run make, and the next problem is on adlc. Compiling /home/jwha/clients/jdk8_build/hotspot/src/share/vm/adlc/adlparse.cpp rm -f ../generated/adfiles/adlparse.o /path/../to/compiler/bin/g++ -DLINU

Re: JDK 8 RFR: JDK-8024603 Turn on javac lint checking for auxiliaryclass, empty, and try in jdk build

2013-10-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-10-02 01:22, Joe Darcy wrote: The webrev above and patch below adds the "auxiliaryclass", "empty", and "try" categories: --- old/makefiles/Setup.gmk2013-10-01 15:53:23.0 -0700 +++ new/makefiles/Setup.gmk2013-10-01 15:53:23.0 -0700 @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ # To build w

Re: Code review for bug fix 8025741

2013-10-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-10-01 23:41, Bhavesh Patel wrote: Hi, There is a bug in jdk/make/docs/Makefile for JDK8. The bug is listed at https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025741. The Makefile for JDK 8 does not include the DEV_DOCS_URL that should point to the developer documentation URL for JDK 8. T

Re: JDK 8 RFR: JDK-8024603 Turn on javac lint checking for auxiliaryclass, empty, and try in jdk build

2013-10-02 Thread Erik Joelsson
The change looks ok. Pushing it through JPRT sounds like a good idea. /Erik On 2013-10-02 01:22, Joe Darcy wrote: Hello, As a follow-up to JDK-8024643 "Turn on javac lint checking in building the jdk repo", the time approaches to enable a few more lint warnings in the build of the jdk repo:

Re: Code review for bug fix 8025741

2013-10-02 Thread Bhavesh Patel
Thanks Magnus. I have made the changes to the common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk file for the new build. I have uploaded the updated webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpatel/8025741/webrev.01/ Thanks, Bhavesh. - Original Message - From: magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com To: bhavesh.x

Re: Code review for bug fix 8025741

2013-10-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-10-02 10:32, Bhavesh Patel wrote: Thanks Magnus. I have made the changes to the common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk file for the new build. I have uploaded the updated webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpatel/8025741/webrev.01/ Looks good to me (but you'll need a formal reviewer

Re: JDK 8 RFR: JDK-8024603 Turn on javac lint checking for auxiliaryclass, empty, and try in jdk build

2013-10-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
Looks good to me Joe. Good to see more lint options being enabled. -Chris. On 02/10/2013 00:22, Joe Darcy wrote: Hello, As a follow-up to JDK-8024643 "Turn on javac lint checking in building the jdk repo", the time approaches to enable a few more lint warnings in the build of the jdk repo: JD

RE: RFR (XS) JDK-8025569: -XX:+CheckUnhandledOops crashes on Windows

2013-10-02 Thread Christian Tornqvist
Hi Lois, Looks good, might be worth clarifying that this disables CheckUnhandledOops for both 32 and 64-bit Windows. Thanks, Christian From: hotspot-runtime-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net [mailto:hotspot-runtime-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Lois Foltan Sent: Tuesday, Oct

Re: RFR (XS) JDK-8025569: -XX:+CheckUnhandledOops crashes on Windows

2013-10-02 Thread Lois Foltan
On 10/2/2013 8:23 AM, Christian Tornqvist wrote: Hi Lois, Looks good, might be worth clarifying that this disables CheckUnhandledOops for both 32 and 64-bit Windows. Hi Christian, Thank you for the review. I will update the the bug with this information and include it in the summary for

Re: Code review for bug fix 8025741

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Bell
Bhavesh: Looks good to me as well. /Tim On 10/ 2/13 01:38 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2013-10-02 10:32, Bhavesh Patel wrote: Thanks Magnus. I have made the changes to the common/makefiles/javadoc/Javadoc.gmk file for the new build. I have uploaded the updated webrev at http://cr.open

RE: code review round 0 for Full Debug Symbols on MacOS X hotspot (7165611)

2013-10-02 Thread Ron Durbin
Dan You have my thumbs up changes look good > -Original Message- > From: David Holmes > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 8:53 PM > To: Daniel Daugherty > Cc: serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net; build-dev; > hotspot-runtime-...@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: code review round 0 for Ful

RFR: 8024522: java.time packages missing from src.zip

2013-10-02 Thread Erik Joelsson
This patch adds java.time to src.zip by replacing all the java/* includes with just java. It also removes two packages that no longer exist. I have verified that the resulting src.zip only differs by adding sources in java/time. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8024522/webrev.jdk.01/ /Erik

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 2 new changesets

2013-10-02 Thread erik . joelsson
Changeset: dd43ccb3bac9 Author:ihse Date: 2013-10-01 11:08 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/dd43ccb3bac9 8019219: Fix typo in jdk/makefiles "default" targets Reviewed-by: erikj ! makefiles/CompileLaunchers.gmk ! makefiles/CompileNativeLibraries.gmk Changese

Re: RFR: 8024522: java.time packages missing from src.zip

2013-10-02 Thread Tim Bell
Erik: This patch adds java.time to src.zip by replacing all the java/* includes with just java. It also removes two packages that no longer exist. I have verified that the resulting src.zip only differs by adding sources in java/time. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8024522/webrev.jdk.01

hg: jdk8/build: 2 new changesets

2013-10-02 Thread erik . joelsson
Changeset: 0f704e36bc5d Author:ihse Date: 2013-10-01 10:58 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/0f704e36bc5d 8006661: Use LC_ALL=C instead of LANG=C compare.sh Reviewed-by: tbell ! common/bin/compare.sh Changeset: 4faa09c7fe55 Author:erikj Date: 2013-10-02

Re: code review round 0 for Full Debug Symbols on MacOS X hotspot (7165611)

2013-10-02 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
David, Thanks for the thorough review (as always)! It will take me a while to process all the comments, but another reply will be forthcoming. Dan On 10/1/13 8:52 PM, David Holmes wrote: Hi Dan, Overall thumbs up. A couple of minor issues that need fixing. A few meta-comments (I hate seein

Re: code review round 0 for Full Debug Symbols on MacOS X hotspot (7165611)

2013-10-02 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Ron, Thanks for the review. Dan On 10/2/13 8:44 AM, Ron Durbin wrote: Dan You have my thumbs up changes look good -Original Message- On 21/09/2013 1:36 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Greetings, I have the initial support for Full Debug Symbols (FDS) on MacOS X done and ready fo

Re: Supporting custom-spec.gmk

2013-10-02 Thread David Holmes
Hi Jeremy, On 3/10/2013 10:20 AM, Jeremy Manson wrote: I note that the bottom of spec.gmk.in has this nugget: # Include the custom-spec.gmk file if it exists -include $(dir @SPEC@)/custom-spec.gmk There is no support in the configuration file to make sure that this file exists in the build dir

Re: Heads up: Removal of the old build system in JDK8

2013-10-02 Thread A. Sundararajan
Nashorn project ($jdk8/nashorn) uses "make" directory contents. Contains NetBeans project. There is a old-style "Makefile" there which can be removed. (Nashorn does not even build with old-style build. That Makefile just instructs to run 'new style build' for nashorn). -Sundar Magnus Ihse Bur

Re: Supporting custom-spec.gmk

2013-10-02 Thread David Holmes
Hi Jeremy, On 3/10/2013 12:58 PM, Jeremy Manson wrote: Hi David, I only sort-of understand what you are saying. My workflow is to create a build/ directory, run configure from the JDK directory in that build/ directory, and then run make. I also want some custom options in my spec. With the