Re: Building OpenJDK 8 on Windows 8.1 Pro -- problems with msvcr100.dll

2013-11-06 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-11-05 17:37, Rich P wrote: After updating toolchain_windows.m4 as you suggest above and re-running "bash ./configure", the script stops with the message: Configure source code has been updated, checking time stamps Running generated-configure.sh I pulled a fresh copy of the sources a

Re: RFR: 8015068 : (m) Use jtreg -exclude for problemlist.txt processing

2013-11-06 Thread Alan Bateman
On 06/11/2013 03:51, Mike Duigou wrote: I have updated the webrev to backout the changes to how JT_HOME is set. This will be addressed in the next set of changes (8020779 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8020779 and 8009683 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8009683) which will

Re: RFR: JDK-8027406 - JDK demos are missing source files

2013-11-06 Thread Alexander Scherbatiy
On 11/6/2013 3:15 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Please review this minor fix for jdk demos MoleculeViewer and WireFrameTest. In JDK-8020060, these were changed to build differently. This had the side effect of putting the source files in a src.zip. It seems that the fixer made an effort to still cop

Re: RFR: 8015068 : (m) Use jtreg -exclude for problemlist.txt processing

2013-11-06 Thread Mike Duigou
Thank you for the review! On Nov 6 2013, at 09:11 , Alan Bateman wrote: > On 06/11/2013 03:51, Mike Duigou wrote: >> I have updated the webrev to backout the changes to how JT_HOME is set. This >> will be addressed in the next set of changes (8020779 >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK

RFR: JDK-8027406 - JDK demos are missing source files

2013-11-06 Thread Erik Joelsson
Please review this minor fix for jdk demos MoleculeViewer and WireFrameTest. In JDK-8020060, these were changed to build differently. This had the side effect of putting the source files in a src.zip. It seems that the fixer made an effort to still copy some source files into the demo dir to re

RE: Building OpenJDK 8 on Windows 8.1 Pro -- problems with msvcr100.dll

2013-11-06 Thread Rich P
Hi Erik -- thanks for the tip. The latest version of autoconf available with the MinGW installation tools was 2.68. I tried installing 2.69 manually but couldn't get it working. Rather than pursuing the build with MinGW, I have installed Cygwin and am going to try this again. Thanks! Rich

Re: RFR: JDK-8027406 - JDK demos are missing source files

2013-11-06 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-11-06 15:37, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote: On 11/6/2013 3:15 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Please review this minor fix for jdk demos MoleculeViewer and WireFrameTest. In JDK-8020060, these were changed to build differently. This had the side effect of putting the source files in a src.zip. I

Re: Removal of the old build system, partial and preliminary review (part 3)

2013-11-06 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-11-06 01:57, David Holmes wrote: On 6/11/2013 12:20 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2013-11-04 12:44, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Unfortunately, WebRev is not very intelligent at presenting these changes. :-( I have made modifications to files that I have also moved, but WebRev just li

Success -- RE: Building OpenJDK 8 on Windows 8.1 Pro -- problems with msvcr100.dll

2013-11-06 Thread Rich P
Hi Magnus, Thx. I installed Cygwin and was able to successfully configure and build the 32 bit OpenJDK! The successful configure command for me was: ./configure --with-target-bits=32 --with-msvcr-dll=/cygdrive/c/windows/syswow64/msvcr100.dll --with-freetype="/cygdrive/c/program files (x8

RFR: 8020779 & 8026988 : Improvements to JTReg executable location handling

2013-11-06 Thread Mike Duigou
Hello all; With JDK-8015068 only very recently pushed it's time for the next set of jtreg test/Makfile changes. These changes improve the configure script detection of jtreg and improve the handling of the specification variables in the jdk and langtools test/Makefiles. This changeset is also t

Re: Removal of the old build system, partial review

2013-11-06 Thread Bradford Wetmore
I've looked over: jdk/make/com/oracle/security/ucrypto jdk/make/com/sun/crypto/provider jdk/make/com/sun/security jdk/make/java/security jdk/make/javax/crypto There may be some things we want to add back as part of the work ErikJ/I are doing jdk/make/javax/others jdk/make/javax/rmi jdk/ma

Re: Removal of the old build system, partial and preliminary review (part 2)

2013-11-06 Thread Bradford Wetmore
I've looked at: jdk/makefiles/CreateSecurityJars.gmk jdk/make/data/cryptopolicy My only comment is the non-CamelCase style names (swingbeaninfo/cryptopolicy/characterdata/charsetmapping/etc), but I guess I can live with it. Brad On 11/1/2013 6:43 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Here is p

Re: Removal of the old build system, partial review

2013-11-06 Thread Bradford Wetmore
On 11/6/2013 9:31 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote: I've looked over: jdk/make/com/oracle/security/ucrypto jdk/make/com/sun/crypto/provider jdk/make/com/sun/security jdk/make/java/security jdk/make/javax/crypto There may be some things we want to add back as part of the work ErikJ/I are doi