These files are used as input to a build tool to create files in the lib
output directory. Since they aren't normal properties files to be
compiled, cleaned or copied to the classes dir, they should be moved to
the make/data dir. I also unified the layout so that the makefile could
be simplifie
What I meant is that zh-hans-cn and zh-cn should be treated as
equivalents. I thought it would be possible to utilize the locale
matching mechanism to do it, but I realize the locale matching of BCP47
doesn't work that way. One solution would be to add another method for
matching tag lookup whi
Hi Erik:
These files are used as input to a build tool to create files in the
lib output directory. Since they aren't normal properties files to be
compiled, cleaned or copied to the classes dir, they should be moved
to the make/data dir. I also unified the layout so that the makefile
could b
On 2/18/14, 7:26 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
What I meant is that zh-hans-cn and zh-cn should be treated as
equivalents.
I think we can assume this only for the providers we own as we know it,
but not for other providers. That's the whole reason Hans/Hant scripts
were introduced.
I thought
* Erik Joelsson [2014-02-17 04:16]:
> At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew
> have their say too.
Feedback from an AWT expert would be appreciated too!
Thanks,
Omair
--
PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/)
Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 664
cc 2d alias also.
The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options in
README-builds.html?
On 14.02.2014 21:27, Omair Majid wrote:
* Andrew Hughes [2014-02-13 23:59]:
As I said in the previous e-mail, the minimum I'd be happy with is if
the current patch was updated so sett
* Sergey Bylokhov [2014-02-18 12:35]:
> cc 2d alias also.
>
> The fix looks good. I am curious who will document all new options
> in README-builds.html?
One thing I have always loved about autotools is self documentation.
With this patch, for example, ./configure --help gives me the new option
- Original Message -
> * Erik Joelsson [2014-02-17 04:16]:
> > At least to me this looks good, but better let Magnus and Andrew
> > have their say too.
>
This looks fine.
> Feedback from an AWT expert would be appreciated too!
>
I'm not sure why this is needed, given it doesn't really
